Immigrants from Syria vs Immigrants from Cambodia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 115,696,103 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Cambodia within Immigrant from Syria communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.220. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Syria within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.032% in Immigrants from Cambodia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Syria corresponds to an increase of 32.5 Immigrants from Cambodia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Syria and Immigrants from Cambodia communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (26.4% compared to 23.3%, a difference of 13.3%), per capita income ($45,218 compared to $40,434, a difference of 11.8%), and median male earnings ($56,830 compared to $51,594, a difference of 10.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,494 compared to $52,450, a difference of 1.9%), median female earnings ($40,499 compared to $38,833, a difference of 4.3%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($96,789 compared to $91,533, a difference of 5.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Syria and Immigrants from Cambodia communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (11.7% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 18.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.9% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 13.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.2% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 11.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (28.3% compared to 28.9%, a difference of 2.2%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.2% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 2.4%), and single male poverty (12.4% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Syria and Immigrants from Cambodia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.1% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 14.3%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.8% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 10.7%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 0.11%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.0% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 0.25%), and unemployment (5.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.57%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Syria and Immigrants from Cambodia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.2% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 4.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.0% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.3% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 1.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.060%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.9% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 0.13%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.4% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 0.15%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Syria and Immigrants from Cambodia communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (29.4% compared to 34.8%, a difference of 18.5%), single father households (2.3% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 18.0%), and single mother households (6.2% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 16.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.2% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 0.38%), family households with children (28.4% compared to 28.9%, a difference of 1.8%), and average family size (3.26 compared to 3.33, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Syria and Immigrants from Cambodia communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.3% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 16.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 8.8%), and no vehicles in household (9.6% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (56.2% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 0.15%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 89.8%, a difference of 0.60%), and no vehicles in household (9.6% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 5.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Syria and Immigrants from Cambodia communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 53.5%), professional degree (4.9% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 34.9%), and doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 27.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.7% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 1.3%), kindergarten (97.7% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 1.3%), and 1st grade (97.7% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Syria and Immigrants from Cambodia communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (5.2% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 13.5%), vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 12.8%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.7% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 12.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 2.2%), hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 2.9%), and disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 3.9%).