Immigrants from Jordan vs Immigrants from Cambodia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 119,256,955 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Cambodia within Immigrant from Jordan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.064. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Jordan within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.012% in Immigrants from Cambodia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Jordan corresponds to a decrease of 11.7 Immigrants from Cambodia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Cambodia communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 23.3%, a difference of 13.0%), per capita income ($45,066 compared to $40,434, a difference of 11.5%), and median family income ($107,715 compared to $97,222, a difference of 10.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,370 compared to $52,450, a difference of 2.1%), median female earnings ($40,977 compared to $38,833, a difference of 5.5%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($97,185 compared to $91,533, a difference of 6.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Cambodia communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.7% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 29.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.2% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 20.8%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (15.6% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 16.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.1% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 1.7%), single male poverty (12.5% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 1.9%), and single mother poverty (27.1% compared to 28.9%, a difference of 6.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Cambodia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 14.0%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 13.7%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.0% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 13.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.5% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 0.66%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.2%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Cambodia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (83.1% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 1.5%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.0% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 0.90%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.4% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 0.74%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.020%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 0.14%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 0.31%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Cambodia communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 21.8%), births to unmarried women (29.0% compared to 34.8%, a difference of 20.1%), and single mother households (6.0% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 19.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.0% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 0.65%), family households with children (28.4% compared to 28.9%, a difference of 1.5%), and divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Cambodia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 18.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 13.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.9% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 1.7%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 89.8%, a difference of 1.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.9% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 5.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Cambodia communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.0% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 72.3%), doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 33.1%), and professional degree (4.7% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 30.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 1.5%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 1.5%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Cambodia communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.4% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 15.5%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 14.3%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.4% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 2.5%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 3.9%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 5.2%).