Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Czechoslovakia
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Czechoslovakia

Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina

Excellent
Average
8,836
SOCIAL INDEX
85.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
45th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
6,212
SOCIAL INDEX
59.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
160th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina Integration in Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 100,641,961 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina within Immigrant from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.563. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Czechoslovakia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.300% in Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Czechoslovakia corresponds to an increase of 299.6 Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina.
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Integration in Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina Communities

Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($51,770 compared to $42,278, a difference of 22.5%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($106,888 compared to $88,819, a difference of 20.3%), and median household income ($95,319 compared to $79,888, a difference of 19.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,352 compared to $50,565, a difference of 7.5%), wage/income gap (27.3% compared to 24.8%, a difference of 9.8%), and median female earnings ($43,571 compared to $38,886, a difference of 12.0%).
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina Income
Income MetricImmigrants from CzechoslovakiaImmigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$51,770
Poor
$42,278
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$116,165
Tragic
$97,432
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$95,319
Tragic
$79,888
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$52,361
Fair
$45,600
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$62,217
Poor
$52,869
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$43,571
Poor
$38,886
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$54,352
Tragic
$50,565
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$106,888
Tragic
$88,819
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$111,914
Tragic
$94,288
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$66,376
Tragic
$55,986
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.3%
Exceptional
24.8%

Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among girls under 16 (14.2% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 18.8%), child poverty under the age of 5 (14.8% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 18.5%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (13.9% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 18.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.1% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 0.52%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 1.3%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.1% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 3.1%).
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from CzechoslovakiaImmigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina
Poverty
Exceptional
11.0%
Good
12.0%
Families
Exceptional
7.7%
Excellent
8.4%
Males
Exceptional
10.0%
Good
11.0%
Females
Exceptional
11.9%
Good
13.2%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
19.1%
Excellent
19.7%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.1%
Average
13.4%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
14.8%
Fair
17.5%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.9%
Fair
16.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.4%
Average
16.4%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.2%
Fair
16.8%
Single Males
Exceptional
12.1%
Exceptional
12.1%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.0%
Average
21.1%
Single Fathers
Good
16.2%
Exceptional
15.2%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
27.4%
Average
29.2%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.6%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
10.0%
Exceptional
10.4%
Seniors Over 75 years
Excellent
11.7%
Exceptional
11.6%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.6%
Good
11.3%

Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.6% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 16.5%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.8% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 15.7%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 15.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.22%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.33%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.5% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 1.5%).
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from CzechoslovakiaImmigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina
Unemployment
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
4.8%
Males
Exceptional
5.1%
Exceptional
4.9%
Females
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
4.7%
Youth < 25
Good
11.5%
Exceptional
10.6%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Fair
17.8%
Exceptional
15.3%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Average
10.3%
Exceptional
9.4%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Good
6.6%
Exceptional
5.7%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Excellent
5.3%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Excellent
4.5%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Excellent
4.4%
Exceptional
4.0%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Fair
4.8%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Fair
4.9%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Good
5.3%
Good
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Good
5.1%
Good
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.4%
Excellent
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.0%
Exceptional
7.3%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Fair
9.0%
Exceptional
8.2%
Women w/ Children < 18
Excellent
5.2%
Exceptional
5.0%

Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.6% compared to 41.8%, a difference of 14.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.0% compared to 78.1%, a difference of 4.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 66.5%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 0.070%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 0.47%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.76%).
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from CzechoslovakiaImmigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Poor
64.8%
Exceptional
66.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Excellent
79.9%
Exceptional
80.8%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Average
36.6%
Exceptional
41.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Average
75.0%
Exceptional
78.1%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.4%
Exceptional
86.3%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.4%
Exceptional
85.8%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
84.8%
Exceptional
85.4%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.4%
Exceptional
83.3%

Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 19.3%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 15.8%), and married-couple households (47.8% compared to 44.4%, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.14 compared to 3.15, a difference of 0.27%), family households with children (26.2% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 2.4%), and family households (63.4% compared to 61.9%, a difference of 2.5%).
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from CzechoslovakiaImmigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina
Family Households
Tragic
63.4%
Tragic
61.9%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.2%
Tragic
26.8%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
47.8%
Tragic
44.4%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.14
Tragic
3.15
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.0%
Average
2.4%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.3%
Average
6.3%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.4%
Fair
46.1%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.7%
Tragic
12.4%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
28.4%
Excellent
30.3%

Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.8% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 18.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 8.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.5% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 5.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (54.1% compared to 53.8%, a difference of 0.60%), 1 or more vehicles in household (88.3% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 2.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.5% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 5.4%).
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from CzechoslovakiaImmigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
11.8%
Good
9.9%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
88.3%
Good
90.1%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
54.1%
Tragic
53.8%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
18.5%
Tragic
17.5%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
5.8%
Tragic
5.3%

Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.8% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 45.5%), doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 41.3%), and master's degree (18.5% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 29.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 7th grade (96.6% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 0.22%), 8th grade (96.4% compared to 96.2%, a difference of 0.24%), and nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.27%).
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from CzechoslovakiaImmigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.8%
Fair
2.1%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.2%
Average
98.0%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.2%
Average
97.9%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Average
97.9%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Average
97.9%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Average
97.8%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Good
97.6%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.7%
Good
97.4%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.4%
Good
97.2%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.6%
Exceptional
96.4%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.4%
Exceptional
96.2%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.7%
Excellent
95.2%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.7%
Excellent
94.2%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.8%
Excellent
93.0%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.7%
Excellent
91.7%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.9%
Excellent
89.8%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
87.9%
Good
86.3%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
69.6%
Average
65.4%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
64.1%
Average
59.2%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
51.9%
Average
46.3%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
44.0%
Average
37.6%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
18.5%
Fair
14.3%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.8%
Tragic
4.0%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.4%
Tragic
1.7%

Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.0% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 14.4%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.0% compared to 23.2%, a difference of 10.6%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.2% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 9.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (3.1% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 0.72%), disability age over 75 (45.1% compared to 46.8%, a difference of 3.7%), and male disability (10.9% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 4.4%).
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from CzechoslovakiaImmigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina
Disability
Exceptional
11.2%
Poor
11.9%
Males
Excellent
10.9%
Fair
11.4%
Females
Exceptional
11.6%
Poor
12.4%
Age | Under 5 years
Excellent
1.2%
Fair
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Fair
5.7%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.3%
Poor
6.8%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.0%
Fair
11.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.0%
Average
23.2%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
45.1%
Excellent
46.8%
Vision
Exceptional
2.0%
Excellent
2.1%
Hearing
Poor
3.1%
Fair
3.1%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.2%
Fair
17.4%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.8%
Fair
6.2%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.4%
Average
2.5%