Pima vs Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 43,382,907 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina within Pima communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.553. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pima within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.018% in Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pima corresponds to an increase of 18.5 Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($30,644 compared to $42,278, a difference of 38.0%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($73,365 compared to $94,288, a difference of 28.5%), and median household income ($63,262 compared to $79,888, a difference of 26.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,503 compared to $50,565, a difference of 1.9%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,821 compared to $88,819, a difference of 7.2%), and median female earnings ($35,326 compared to $38,886, a difference of 10.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (11.4% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 135.8%), family poverty (18.4% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 118.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (23.9% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 106.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.8% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 2.7%), single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 29.2%, a difference of 32.0%), and single female poverty (30.3% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 43.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (11.8% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 164.4%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (11.7% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 133.6%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (18.9% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 131.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 7.4%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 12.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 22.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 41.8%, a difference of 22.6%), in labor force | age 20-64 (69.0% compared to 80.8%, a difference of 17.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (74.3% compared to 86.3%, a difference of 16.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (79.0% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 8.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (69.0% compared to 78.1%, a difference of 13.2%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (74.8% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 14.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina communities in the United States are seen in single father households (4.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 77.3%), births to unmarried women (51.5% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 69.7%), and single mother households (8.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 30.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.1% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 0.94%), divorced or separated (12.9% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 4.0%), and family households (65.9% compared to 61.9%, a difference of 6.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 47.5%), no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 42.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 25.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 53.8%, a difference of 3.4%), 1 or more vehicles in household (86.3% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 4.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 25.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (23.2% compared to 37.6%, a difference of 62.0%), master's degree (9.2% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 54.8%), and associate's degree (30.2% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 53.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 6th grade (97.2% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.060%), 5th grade (97.6% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.15%), and 4th grade (97.7% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.17%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (38.6% compared to 23.2%, a difference of 66.2%), vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 57.5%), and disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 41.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.8% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 7.8%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.2% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 8.9%), and male disability (12.8% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 12.7%).