Immigrants from Morocco vs Immigrants from Australia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 121,105,590 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Australia within Immigrant from Morocco communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.151. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Morocco within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.012% in Immigrants from Australia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Morocco corresponds to a decrease of 12.2 Immigrants from Australia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Morocco and Immigrants from Australia communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($46,430 compared to $57,953, a difference of 24.8%), median family income ($105,964 compared to $126,620, a difference of 19.5%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($97,305 compared to $115,947, a difference of 19.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,593 compared to $56,660, a difference of 3.8%), median female earnings ($42,229 compared to $46,573, a difference of 10.3%), and householder income over 65 years ($60,647 compared to $69,164, a difference of 14.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Morocco and Immigrants from Australia communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (11.9% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 29.9%), married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 23.0%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (16.6% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 21.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.3% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 0.58%), single father poverty (16.3% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 3.6%), and single mother poverty (28.4% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Morocco and Immigrants from Australia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.4% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 10.0%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.6% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 9.5%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 9.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 1.1%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.9% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Morocco and Immigrants from Australia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.4% compared to 35.1%, a difference of 3.8%), in labor force | age > 16 (67.2% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 2.0%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.9% compared to 74.6%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 0.030%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.5% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 0.16%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.2% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.54%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Morocco and Immigrants from Australia communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 23.9%), births to unmarried women (30.4% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 14.0%), and single father households (2.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 10.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.0% compared to 61.3%, a difference of 1.2%), average family size (3.21 compared to 3.13, a difference of 2.6%), and family households with children (27.0% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Morocco and Immigrants from Australia communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.1% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 14.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (16.3% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 10.8%), and no vehicles in household (12.6% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 9.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.4% compared to 86.4%, a difference of 1.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (50.3% compared to 52.4%, a difference of 4.2%), and no vehicles in household (12.6% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 9.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Morocco and Immigrants from Australia communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.0% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 39.3%), doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 37.1%), and no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 28.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.8% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.57%), kindergarten (97.7% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.57%), and 1st grade (97.7% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.58%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Morocco and Immigrants from Australia communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 14.9%), disability age 65 to 74 (22.9% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 9.2%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.5% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 8.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 0.89%), cognitive disability (17.5% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 2.3%), and male disability (10.6% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 2.3%).