Pima vs Immigrants from Australia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 51,851,519 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Australia within Pima communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.138. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pima within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.005% in Immigrants from Australia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pima corresponds to a decrease of 5.3 Immigrants from Australia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Australia communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($30,644 compared to $57,953, a difference of 89.1%), median family income ($77,431 compared to $126,620, a difference of 63.5%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($73,365 compared to $119,308, a difference of 62.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,503 compared to $56,660, a difference of 10.0%), median female earnings ($35,326 compared to $46,573, a difference of 31.8%), and wage/income gap (21.1% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 33.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Australia communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (11.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 160.3%), family poverty (18.4% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 142.6%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (29.7% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 113.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.8% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 6.5%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (28.4% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 35.6%), and single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 41.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Australia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (11.8% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 164.9%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (11.7% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 128.8%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (18.9% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 126.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 7.1%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 14.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 23.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Australia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (69.0% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 15.9%), in labor force | age 25-29 (74.3% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 14.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (57.4% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 14.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 35.1%, a difference of 2.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (69.0% compared to 74.6%, a difference of 8.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (79.0% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 8.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Australia communities in the United States are seen in single father households (4.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 111.2%), births to unmarried women (51.5% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 93.4%), and single mother households (8.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 62.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.1% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 4.2%), family households (65.9% compared to 61.3%, a difference of 7.6%), and divorced or separated (12.9% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 14.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Australia communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 35.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 21.9%), and no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.3% compared to 86.4%, a difference of 0.080%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 52.4%, a difference of 0.81%), and no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Australia communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (9.2% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 125.6%), doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 112.4%), and bachelor's degree (23.2% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 109.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.070%), 1st grade (98.2% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.070%), and 2nd grade (98.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.070%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Australia communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (38.6% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 84.1%), vision disability (3.3% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 70.9%), and disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 67.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 9.4%), cognitive disability (18.8% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 9.7%), and self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 22.7%).