Immigrants from Congo vs Immigrants from Armenia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 43,122,815 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Armenia within Immigrant from Congo communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.857. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Congo within a typical geography, there is an increase of 2.594% in Immigrants from Armenia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Congo corresponds to an increase of 2,594.5 Immigrants from Armenia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Immigrants from Armenia communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($72,178 compared to $94,867, a difference of 31.4%), median household income ($66,768 compared to $83,555, a difference of 25.1%), and per capita income ($35,720 compared to $44,552, a difference of 24.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (21.7% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 4.6%), householder income over 65 years ($51,393 compared to $53,974, a difference of 5.0%), and median male earnings ($44,204 compared to $51,793, a difference of 17.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Immigrants from Armenia communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.5% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 39.9%), child poverty under the age of 5 (23.9% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 36.8%), and single female poverty (25.3% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 35.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.4% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 1.5%), receiving food stamps (14.1% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 8.7%), and single male poverty (13.9% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 13.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Immigrants from Armenia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.1% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 44.6%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.3% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 39.1%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.3% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 39.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (6.7% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 3.4%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.0% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 8.1%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 10.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Immigrants from Armenia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.7% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 43.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 71.7%, a difference of 8.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (67.1% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 2.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.3% compared to 79.2%, a difference of 0.090%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.6% compared to 81.7%, a difference of 0.14%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.17%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Immigrants from Armenia communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 57.4%), births to unmarried women (36.8% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 41.2%), and divorced or separated (13.5% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 27.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.23 compared to 3.35, a difference of 3.7%), family households with children (27.3% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 6.9%), and family households (59.2% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 7.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Immigrants from Armenia communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.2% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 23.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.0% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 9.8%), and no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.0% compared to 89.4%, a difference of 0.65%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.1% compared to 53.3%, a difference of 2.2%), and no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 5.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Immigrants from Armenia communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.4% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 40.0%), professional degree (3.6% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 24.4%), and bachelor's degree (33.6% compared to 39.4%, a difference of 17.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (83.1% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 0.010%), kindergarten (97.6% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 0.98%), and nursery school (97.6% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 0.99%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Immigrants from Armenia communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (2.4% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 77.6%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.2% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 52.8%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 42.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (12.7% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 0.49%), disability (12.2% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 4.0%), and hearing disability (2.9% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 5.7%).