Immigrants from Jordan vs Immigrants from Armenia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 70,923,061 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Armenia within Immigrant from Jordan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.298. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Jordan within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.205% in Immigrants from Armenia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Jordan corresponds to an increase of 205.4 Immigrants from Armenia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Armenia communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 26.9%), householder income over 65 years ($63,041 compared to $53,974, a difference of 16.8%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($106,164 compared to $94,863, a difference of 11.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($45,066 compared to $44,552, a difference of 1.1%), median female earnings ($40,977 compared to $40,340, a difference of 1.6%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($97,185 compared to $94,867, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Armenia communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 49.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.2% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 48.3%), and married-couple family poverty (5.1% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 38.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.1% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 0.95%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.4% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 1.6%), and single male poverty (12.5% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Armenia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.3% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 44.2%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 40.8%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.0% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 39.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.5% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 1.1%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 10.3%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 17.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Armenia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.9% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 27.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 71.7%, a difference of 5.5%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.1% compared to 81.7%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.010%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.31%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.4% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 0.78%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Armenia communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.0% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 17.2%), family households with children (28.4% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 11.3%), and births to unmarried women (29.0% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 11.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.0% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 2.4%), average family size (3.24 compared to 3.35, a difference of 3.2%), and single father households (2.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Armenia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 22.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 53.3%, a difference of 7.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.9% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 6.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 0.31%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 89.4%, a difference of 2.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.9% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 6.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Armenia communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.0% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 64.9%), doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 18.1%), and master's degree (16.1% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 11.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 1.4%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 1.4%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Armenia communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (2.4% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 77.3%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 0.76%, a difference of 49.7%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.3% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 30.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (10.6% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 1.1%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 2.2%), and hearing disability (2.9% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 4.9%).