Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Ethiopian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 125,242,038 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Ethiopians within Immigrant from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.425. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Czechoslovakia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.237% in Ethiopians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Czechoslovakia corresponds to an increase of 236.8 Ethiopians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Ethiopian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.3% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 24.9%), per capita income ($51,770 compared to $46,569, a difference of 11.2%), and median male earnings ($62,217 compared to $56,243, a difference of 10.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($43,571 compared to $43,243, a difference of 0.76%), householder income under 25 years ($54,352 compared to $53,818, a difference of 0.99%), and householder income over 65 years ($66,376 compared to $64,989, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Ethiopian communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (16.2% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 19.6%), child poverty under the age of 16 (13.9% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 17.4%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (14.2% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 16.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 0.99%), single mother poverty (27.4% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 1.4%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.1% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Ethiopian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 8.1%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 8.1%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.6% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 7.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.8% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 0.010%), male unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.080%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 0.15%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Ethiopian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 69.3%, a difference of 7.0%), in labor force | age 16-19 (36.6% compared to 38.2%, a difference of 4.6%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.0% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.4% compared to 86.2%, a difference of 0.88%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 85.9%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 86.6%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Ethiopian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.3% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 22.0%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 18.4%), and married-couple households (47.8% compared to 43.2%, a difference of 10.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 2.8%), average family size (3.14 compared to 3.24, a difference of 3.0%), and family households (63.4% compared to 61.2%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Ethiopian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.8% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 12.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.5% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 3.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.1% compared to 53.1%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 0.010%), 1 or more vehicles in household (88.3% compared to 89.6%, a difference of 1.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.1% compared to 53.1%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Ethiopian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 33.2%), professional degree (5.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 8.7%), and master's degree (18.5% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 0.55%), nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.62%), and kindergarten (98.2% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.62%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Ethiopian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.1% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 16.5%), cognitive disability (16.2% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 10.6%), and ambulatory disability (5.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 0.89%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 2.3%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 2.5%).