Pima vs Ethiopian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Pima
Ethiopian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Pima
Ethiopians
1,700
SOCIAL INDEX
14.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
291st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,266
SOCIAL INDEX
70.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
126th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Ethiopian Integration in Pima Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 50,714,298 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Ethiopians within Pima communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.676. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pima within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.077% in Ethiopians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pima corresponds to an increase of 77.0 Ethiopians.
Pima vs Ethiopian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Pima and Ethiopian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($30,644 compared to $46,569, a difference of 52.0%), median household income ($63,262 compared to $89,640, a difference of 41.7%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($73,365 compared to $103,736, a difference of 41.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (21.1% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 3.4%), householder income under 25 years ($51,503 compared to $53,818, a difference of 4.5%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,821 compared to $96,824, a difference of 16.9%).
Income Metric | Pima | Ethiopian |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $30,644 | Exceptional $46,569 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $77,431 | Exceptional $108,251 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $63,262 | Exceptional $89,640 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $38,285 | Exceptional $49,572 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $42,357 | Excellent $56,243 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $35,326 | Exceptional $43,243 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Poor $51,503 | Exceptional $53,818 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $82,821 | Good $96,824 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $73,365 | Excellent $103,736 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $50,539 | Exceptional $64,989 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 21.1% | Exceptional 21.8% |
Pima vs Ethiopian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pima and Ethiopian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (11.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 123.5%), family poverty (18.4% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 108.5%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (25.3% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 103.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.8% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 9.0%), single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 39.2%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (28.4% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 40.9%).
Poverty Metric | Pima | Ethiopian |
Poverty | Tragic 21.9% | Average 12.2% |
Families | Tragic 18.4% | Good 8.8% |
Males | Tragic 20.4% | Average 11.1% |
Females | Tragic 23.6% | Good 13.3% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 28.4% | Average 20.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 25.3% | Exceptional 12.4% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 27.4% | Excellent 16.5% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 29.0% | Average 16.3% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 29.7% | Average 16.5% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 28.2% | Average 16.5% |
Single Males | Tragic 20.2% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Single Females | Tragic 30.3% | Exceptional 19.9% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 14.8% | Exceptional 13.5% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 38.6% | Exceptional 27.7% |
Married Couples | Tragic 11.4% | Good 5.1% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 19.8% | Good 10.7% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 23.9% | Excellent 11.8% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 19.0% | Exceptional 10.6% |
Pima vs Ethiopian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pima and Ethiopian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (11.8% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 159.6%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (11.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 120.3%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (18.9% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 109.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 1.6%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 7.0%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.3% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 29.1%).
Unemployment Metric | Pima | Ethiopian |
Unemployment | Tragic 8.2% | Excellent 5.1% |
Males | Tragic 8.3% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Females | Tragic 9.3% | Excellent 5.1% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 16.2% | Excellent 11.4% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 23.1% | Fair 17.8% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 14.2% | Exceptional 9.8% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 11.8% | Exceptional 6.1% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 9.6% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 11.8% | Excellent 4.5% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 6.4% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 6.6% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Excellent 4.8% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 6.6% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 6.3% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.2% | Good 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 13.4% | Exceptional 6.8% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 18.9% | Fair 9.0% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 11.7% | Excellent 5.3% |
Pima vs Ethiopian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pima and Ethiopian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (57.4% compared to 69.3%, a difference of 20.7%), in labor force | age 20-64 (69.0% compared to 82.0%, a difference of 18.7%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (72.8% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 16.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (79.0% compared to 86.6%, a difference of 9.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (69.0% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 12.0%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 38.2%, a difference of 12.2%).
Labor Participation Metric | Pima | Ethiopian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 57.4% | Exceptional 69.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 69.0% | Exceptional 82.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 34.1% | Exceptional 38.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 69.0% | Exceptional 77.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 74.3% | Exceptional 86.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 79.0% | Exceptional 86.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 74.8% | Exceptional 85.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 72.8% | Exceptional 84.8% |
Pima vs Ethiopian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pima and Ethiopian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (4.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 73.5%), births to unmarried women (51.5% compared to 29.8%, a difference of 72.5%), and single mother households (8.3% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 27.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.1% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 1.9%), divorced or separated (12.9% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 7.2%), and family households (65.9% compared to 61.2%, a difference of 7.7%).
Family Structure Metric | Pima | Ethiopian |
Family Households | Exceptional 65.9% | Tragic 61.2% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 27.1% | Good 27.6% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 35.6% | Tragic 43.2% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.75 | Good 3.24 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 4.2% | Poor 2.4% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 8.3% | Fair 6.5% |
Currently Married | Tragic 35.9% | Tragic 44.5% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 12.9% | Average 12.0% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 51.5% | Exceptional 29.8% |
Pima vs Ethiopian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pima and Ethiopian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 36.1%), no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 35.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 23.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 53.1%, a difference of 2.1%), 1 or more vehicles in household (86.3% compared to 89.6%, a difference of 3.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 23.2%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Pima | Ethiopian |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 14.1% | Average 10.5% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 86.3% | Average 89.6% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 52.0% | Tragic 53.1% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.0% | Tragic 17.9% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.9% | Tragic 5.8% |
Pima vs Ethiopian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pima and Ethiopian communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (9.2% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 94.3%), bachelor's degree (23.2% compared to 42.8%, a difference of 84.4%), and doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 78.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (93.9% compared to 94.4%, a difference of 0.47%), 8th grade (95.6% compared to 95.1%, a difference of 0.49%), and nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.63%).
Education Level Metric | Pima | Ethiopian |
No Schooling Completed | Average 2.1% | Tragic 2.4% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 97.6% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 97.6% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 97.6% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 97.5% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Tragic 97.4% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 97.7% | Tragic 97.1% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Tragic 96.9% |
6th Grade | Excellent 97.2% | Tragic 96.6% |
7th Grade | Good 96.1% | Tragic 95.4% |
8th Grade | Fair 95.6% | Tragic 95.1% |
9th Grade | Tragic 93.9% | Tragic 94.4% |
10th Grade | Tragic 91.2% | Tragic 93.2% |
11th Grade | Tragic 88.3% | Poor 92.2% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 84.6% | Fair 91.0% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 81.6% | Fair 89.0% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 76.4% | Good 86.0% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 51.4% | Exceptional 68.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 45.6% | Exceptional 62.9% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 30.2% | Exceptional 50.4% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 23.2% | Exceptional 42.8% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 9.2% | Exceptional 18.0% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.3% | Exceptional 5.4% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.3% | Exceptional 2.3% |
Pima vs Ethiopian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pima and Ethiopian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (38.6% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 70.3%), vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 68.9%), and disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 54.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.8% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 4.8%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 7.4%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 15.8%).
Disability Metric | Pima | Ethiopian |
Disability | Tragic 13.7% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Males | Tragic 12.8% | Exceptional 10.2% |
Females | Tragic 14.8% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.1% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.2% | Exceptional 5.3% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.7% | Exceptional 6.2% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.1% | Exceptional 10.5% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 38.6% | Excellent 22.7% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 55.8% | Excellent 46.8% |
Vision | Tragic 3.3% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.7% | Exceptional 2.7% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.8% | Tragic 17.9% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.2% | Exceptional 5.4% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.8% | Exceptional 2.2% |