Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Cuban Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Cuban
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar

Cubans

Fair
Fair
3,365
SOCIAL INDEX
31.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
222nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,662
SOCIAL INDEX
34.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
213th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Cuban Integration in Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 164,710,020 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Cubans within Immigrant from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.045. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.011% in Cubans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar corresponds to a decrease of 10.9 Cubans.
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Integration in Cuban Communities

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Cuban Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Cuban communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($57,114 compared to $49,152, a difference of 16.2%), median family income ($94,472 compared to $84,981, a difference of 11.2%), and median female earnings ($38,028 compared to $34,942, a difference of 8.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (22.8% compared to 23.3%, a difference of 1.8%), householder income under 25 years ($48,749 compared to $50,655, a difference of 3.9%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($91,385 compared to $86,301, a difference of 5.9%).
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Cuban Income
Income MetricImmigrants from Burma/MyanmarCuban
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$39,827
Tragic
$37,383
Median Family Income
Tragic
$94,472
Tragic
$84,981
Median Household Income
Tragic
$78,682
Tragic
$73,392
Median Earnings
Tragic
$43,998
Tragic
$40,619
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$50,298
Tragic
$46,580
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$38,028
Tragic
$34,942
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$48,749
Tragic
$50,655
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$86,736
Tragic
$81,483
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$91,385
Tragic
$86,301
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$57,114
Tragic
$49,152
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
22.8%
Exceptional
23.3%

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Cuban Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Cuban communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.1% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 48.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.3% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 43.1%), and receiving food stamps (12.9% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 41.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty (15.4% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 0.38%), single father poverty (16.5% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 0.74%), and family poverty (10.5% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 0.98%).
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Cuban Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from Burma/MyanmarCuban
Poverty
Tragic
14.2%
Tragic
13.9%
Families
Tragic
10.5%
Tragic
10.6%
Males
Tragic
13.0%
Tragic
12.4%
Females
Tragic
15.4%
Tragic
15.3%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
21.6%
Exceptional
17.2%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
15.2%
Tragic
14.7%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
20.4%
Tragic
19.1%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.4%
Tragic
17.8%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.2%
Tragic
17.9%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
19.7%
Tragic
18.0%
Single Males
Poor
13.1%
Good
12.6%
Single Females
Tragic
22.6%
Average
21.0%
Single Fathers
Fair
16.5%
Poor
16.6%
Single Mothers
Tragic
30.6%
Fair
29.6%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.0%
Tragic
6.8%
Seniors Over 65 years
Fair
11.3%
Tragic
16.1%
Seniors Over 75 years
Good
12.1%
Tragic
18.0%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
12.9%
Tragic
18.2%

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Cuban Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Cuban communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.5% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 22.1%), male unemployment (5.2% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 12.6%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.6% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 10.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.050%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.6% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 0.34%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.52%).
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Cuban Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from Burma/MyanmarCuban
Unemployment
Excellent
5.1%
Exceptional
4.7%
Males
Good
5.2%
Exceptional
4.6%
Females
Exceptional
5.1%
Exceptional
4.9%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.6%
Exceptional
10.6%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
15.6%
Exceptional
16.9%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.1%
Exceptional
9.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Exceptional
5.9%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Good
4.6%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Exceptional
4.0%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.6%
Exceptional
4.6%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.7%
Exceptional
8.0%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.3%
Exceptional
7.0%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
7.5%
Poor
9.2%
Women w/ Children < 18
Good
5.4%
Exceptional
5.2%

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Cuban Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Cuban communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.0% compared to 31.8%, a difference of 22.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.3% compared to 72.5%, a difference of 5.3%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.3% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 0.15%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.61%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.0% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.99%).
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Cuban Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from Burma/MyanmarCuban
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.3%
Tragic
64.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Good
79.7%
Average
79.5%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
39.0%
Tragic
31.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
76.3%
Tragic
72.5%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Average
84.7%
Tragic
83.5%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Average
84.7%
Tragic
84.2%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
84.0%
Exceptional
84.8%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
82.0%
Exceptional
83.4%

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Cuban Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Cuban communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (32.9% compared to 39.4%, a difference of 19.8%), divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 19.4%), and family households (62.6% compared to 67.7%, a difference of 8.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (44.3% compared to 44.6%, a difference of 0.78%), average family size (3.29 compared to 3.25, a difference of 1.2%), and single mother households (7.0% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 2.2%).
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Cuban Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from Burma/MyanmarCuban
Family Households
Tragic
62.6%
Exceptional
67.7%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.0%
Poor
27.1%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
43.4%
Tragic
45.4%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.29
Excellent
3.25
Single Father Households
Poor
2.4%
Tragic
2.6%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.0%
Tragic
7.2%
Currently Married
Tragic
44.3%
Tragic
44.6%
Divorced or Separated
Fair
12.1%
Tragic
14.5%
Births to Unmarried Women
Poor
32.9%
Tragic
39.4%

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Cuban Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Cuban communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 22.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 4.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (53.9% compared to 56.3%, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.7% compared to 91.5%, a difference of 2.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 2.5%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (53.9% compared to 56.3%, a difference of 4.4%).
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Cuban Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from Burma/MyanmarCuban
No Vehicles Available
Average
10.4%
Exceptional
8.5%
1+ Vehicles Available
Average
89.7%
Exceptional
91.5%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
53.9%
Excellent
56.3%
3+ Vehicles Available
Poor
18.8%
Fair
19.3%
4+ Vehicles Available
Fair
6.2%
Tragic
6.0%

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Cuban Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Cuban communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.1% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 25.0%), doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 24.5%), and master's degree (13.5% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 11.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (94.1% compared to 94.1%, a difference of 0.010%), 12th grade, no diploma (88.9% compared to 88.9%, a difference of 0.010%), and 9th grade (93.1% compared to 93.2%, a difference of 0.020%).
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Cuban Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from Burma/MyanmarCuban
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
3.1%
Tragic
2.5%
Nursery School
Tragic
96.9%
Tragic
97.6%
Kindergarten
Tragic
96.8%
Tragic
97.5%
1st Grade
Tragic
96.8%
Tragic
97.5%
2nd Grade
Tragic
96.7%
Tragic
97.4%
3rd Grade
Tragic
96.6%
Tragic
97.3%
4th Grade
Tragic
96.3%
Tragic
96.9%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.1%
Tragic
96.6%
6th Grade
Tragic
95.7%
Tragic
96.2%
7th Grade
Tragic
94.5%
Tragic
94.6%
8th Grade
Tragic
94.1%
Tragic
94.1%
9th Grade
Tragic
93.1%
Tragic
93.2%
10th Grade
Tragic
91.8%
Tragic
91.5%
11th Grade
Tragic
90.4%
Tragic
90.2%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
88.9%
Tragic
88.9%
High School Diploma
Tragic
86.7%
Tragic
85.4%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
83.0%
Tragic
82.0%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
62.5%
Tragic
58.6%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
56.6%
Tragic
53.4%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
43.7%
Tragic
41.9%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
35.5%
Tragic
32.5%
Master's Degree
Tragic
13.5%
Tragic
12.1%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.9%
Tragic
4.0%
Doctorate Degree
Poor
1.7%
Tragic
1.4%

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Cuban Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Cuban communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (12.3% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 22.5%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 19.6%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 10.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.9% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 0.95%), female disability (12.4% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 1.2%), and disability (11.8% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 1.3%).
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Cuban Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from Burma/MyanmarCuban
Disability
Fair
11.8%
Average
11.7%
Males
Average
11.2%
Good
11.0%
Females
Poor
12.4%
Fair
12.3%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Average
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Average
5.6%
Exceptional
5.3%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Poor
6.8%
Exceptional
5.7%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
12.3%
Exceptional
10.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Poor
24.0%
Average
23.3%
Age | Over 75 years
Poor
47.9%
Average
47.4%
Vision
Fair
2.2%
Tragic
2.4%
Hearing
Good
2.9%
Excellent
2.8%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.2%
Exceptional
16.5%
Ambulatory
Average
6.1%
Tragic
6.4%
Self-Care
Average
2.5%
Tragic
2.7%