Immigrants from Oceania vs Cuban Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from Oceania
Cuban
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from Oceania
Cubans
6,183
SOCIAL INDEX
59.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
161st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,662
SOCIAL INDEX
34.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
213th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Cuban Integration in Immigrants from Oceania Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 278,889,478 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Cubans within Immigrant from Oceania communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.003. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Oceania within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.000% in Cubans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Oceania corresponds to an increase of 0.2 Cubans.
Immigrants from Oceania vs Cuban Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Cuban communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($64,416 compared to $49,152, a difference of 31.1%), median family income ($106,453 compared to $84,981, a difference of 25.3%), and median household income ($89,100 compared to $73,392, a difference of 21.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,680 compared to $50,655, a difference of 6.0%), wage/income gap (25.6% compared to 23.3%, a difference of 10.2%), and median female earnings ($40,297 compared to $34,942, a difference of 15.3%).
Income Metric | Immigrants from Oceania | Cuban |
Per Capita Income | Excellent $45,220 | Tragic $37,383 |
Median Family Income | Excellent $106,453 | Tragic $84,981 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $89,100 | Tragic $73,392 |
Median Earnings | Excellent $47,617 | Tragic $40,619 |
Median Male Earnings | Good $55,712 | Tragic $46,580 |
Median Female Earnings | Good $40,297 | Tragic $34,942 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $53,680 | Tragic $50,655 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Excellent $97,623 | Tragic $81,483 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Excellent $103,705 | Tragic $86,301 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $64,416 | Tragic $49,152 |
Wage/Income Gap | Average 25.6% | Exceptional 23.3% |
Immigrants from Oceania vs Cuban Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Cuban communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (11.4% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 60.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.4% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 54.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 53.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.4% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 1.3%), single female poverty (20.7% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 1.7%), and single mother poverty (28.7% compared to 29.6%, a difference of 3.3%).
Poverty Metric | Immigrants from Oceania | Cuban |
Poverty | Average 12.3% | Tragic 13.9% |
Families | Good 8.7% | Tragic 10.6% |
Males | Average 11.2% | Tragic 12.4% |
Females | Average 13.3% | Tragic 15.3% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Excellent 19.7% | Exceptional 17.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Average 13.5% | Tragic 14.7% |
Children Under 5 years | Good 16.9% | Tragic 19.1% |
Children Under 16 years | Good 15.9% | Tragic 17.8% |
Boys Under 16 years | Good 16.0% | Tragic 17.9% |
Girls Under 16 years | Good 16.1% | Tragic 18.0% |
Single Males | Exceptional 12.4% | Good 12.6% |
Single Females | Good 20.7% | Average 21.0% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.4% | Poor 16.6% |
Single Mothers | Good 28.7% | Fair 29.6% |
Married Couples | Good 5.0% | Tragic 6.8% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Excellent 10.4% | Tragic 16.1% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Excellent 11.7% | Tragic 18.0% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Good 11.4% | Tragic 18.2% |
Immigrants from Oceania vs Cuban Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Cuban communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (5.3% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 15.3%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.8% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 14.5%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.1% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 13.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.5%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.2% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 1.9%), and female unemployment (5.2% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 4.3%).
Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from Oceania | Cuban |
Unemployment | Good 5.2% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Males | Average 5.3% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Females | Good 5.2% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Youth < 25 | Excellent 11.4% | Exceptional 10.6% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Excellent 17.2% | Exceptional 16.9% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 10.0% | Exceptional 9.2% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.4% | Exceptional 5.9% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Good 5.4% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Fair 4.8% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Excellent 4.4% | Exceptional 4.0% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.2% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Seniors > 75 | Poor 9.0% | Exceptional 8.0% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Good 7.5% | Exceptional 7.0% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.1% | Poor 9.2% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Excellent 5.3% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Immigrants from Oceania vs Cuban Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Cuban communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.9% compared to 31.8%, a difference of 19.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 72.5%, a difference of 5.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.0% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.20%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.3% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 0.26%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 0.86%).
Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from Oceania | Cuban |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Excellent 65.5% | Tragic 64.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Poor 79.3% | Average 79.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 37.9% | Tragic 31.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 76.1% | Tragic 72.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 84.2% | Tragic 83.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 84.0% | Tragic 84.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 83.9% | Exceptional 84.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 82.1% | Exceptional 83.4% |
Immigrants from Oceania vs Cuban Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Cuban communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.6% compared to 39.4%, a difference of 28.8%), divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 21.6%), and single mother households (6.3% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 14.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.29 compared to 3.25, a difference of 1.3%), married-couple households (46.9% compared to 45.4%, a difference of 3.4%), and family households with children (28.1% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 3.5%).
Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from Oceania | Cuban |
Family Households | Exceptional 64.9% | Exceptional 67.7% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.1% | Poor 27.1% |
Married-couple Households | Good 46.9% | Tragic 45.4% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.29 | Excellent 3.25 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.5% | Tragic 2.6% |
Single Mother Households | Average 6.3% | Tragic 7.2% |
Currently Married | Average 46.5% | Tragic 44.6% |
Divorced or Separated | Good 11.9% | Tragic 14.5% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Excellent 30.6% | Tragic 39.4% |
Immigrants from Oceania vs Cuban Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Cuban communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 28.0%), no vehicles in household (9.7% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 14.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 13.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 91.5%, a difference of 1.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.5% compared to 56.3%, a difference of 2.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 13.0%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from Oceania | Cuban |
No Vehicles Available | Excellent 9.7% | Exceptional 8.5% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 90.4% | Exceptional 91.5% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 57.5% | Excellent 56.3% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 21.8% | Fair 19.3% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.6% | Tragic 6.0% |
Immigrants from Oceania vs Cuban Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Cuban communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 38.7%), master's degree (14.7% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 21.5%), and professional degree (4.6% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 15.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.8% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.25%), kindergarten (97.8% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.28%), and 1st grade (97.8% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.28%).
Education Level Metric | Immigrants from Oceania | Cuban |
No Schooling Completed | Poor 2.2% | Tragic 2.5% |
Nursery School | Poor 97.8% | Tragic 97.6% |
Kindergarten | Poor 97.8% | Tragic 97.5% |
1st Grade | Poor 97.8% | Tragic 97.5% |
2nd Grade | Poor 97.7% | Tragic 97.4% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 97.6% | Tragic 97.3% |
4th Grade | Tragic 97.3% | Tragic 96.9% |
5th Grade | Poor 97.1% | Tragic 96.6% |
6th Grade | Poor 96.8% | Tragic 96.2% |
7th Grade | Tragic 95.7% | Tragic 94.6% |
8th Grade | Tragic 95.3% | Tragic 94.1% |
9th Grade | Poor 94.5% | Tragic 93.2% |
10th Grade | Poor 93.4% | Tragic 91.5% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.2% | Tragic 90.2% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Fair 90.9% | Tragic 88.9% |
High School Diploma | Fair 88.8% | Tragic 85.4% |
GED/Equivalency | Fair 85.5% | Tragic 82.0% |
College, Under 1 year | Average 65.6% | Tragic 58.6% |
College, 1 year or more | Average 59.4% | Tragic 53.4% |
Associate's Degree | Fair 45.8% | Tragic 41.9% |
Bachelor's Degree | Fair 37.3% | Tragic 32.5% |
Master's Degree | Fair 14.7% | Tragic 12.1% |
Professional Degree | Good 4.6% | Tragic 4.0% |
Doctorate Degree | Good 1.9% | Tragic 1.4% |
Immigrants from Oceania vs Cuban Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Cuban communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (6.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 16.8%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.4% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 13.4%), and hearing disability (3.2% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 11.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (12.1% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 0.98%), disability (11.8% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 1.0%), and disability age over 75 (48.0% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 1.2%).
Disability Metric | Immigrants from Oceania | Cuban |
Disability | Fair 11.8% | Average 11.7% |
Males | Fair 11.4% | Good 11.0% |
Females | Good 12.1% | Fair 12.3% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.2% | Average 1.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.4% | Exceptional 5.3% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Fair 6.7% | Exceptional 5.7% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Fair 11.4% | Exceptional 10.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Poor 24.0% | Average 23.3% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 48.0% | Average 47.4% |
Vision | Average 2.2% | Tragic 2.4% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.2% | Excellent 2.8% |
Cognitive | Tragic 17.6% | Exceptional 16.5% |
Ambulatory | Good 6.1% | Tragic 6.4% |
Self-Care | Fair 2.5% | Tragic 2.7% |