Luxembourger vs Central American Community Comparison

COMPARE

Luxembourger
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Central American
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Luxembourgers

Central Americans

Excellent
Poor
9,215
SOCIAL INDEX
89.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
27th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,952
SOCIAL INDEX
17.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
278th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Central American Integration in Luxembourger Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 139,555,452 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Central Americans within Luxembourger communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.373. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Luxembourgers within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.255% in Central Americans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Luxembourgers corresponds to an increase of 255.4 Central Americans.
Luxembourger Integration in Central American Communities

Luxembourger vs Central American Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Central American communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 18.7%), per capita income ($45,663 compared to $38,560, a difference of 18.4%), and median male earnings ($56,300 compared to $48,093, a difference of 17.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,379 compared to $52,626, a difference of 4.5%), householder income over 65 years ($60,967 compared to $56,321, a difference of 8.3%), and median female earnings ($39,891 compared to $36,492, a difference of 9.3%).
Luxembourger vs Central American Income
Income MetricLuxembourgerCentral American
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$45,663
Tragic
$38,560
Median Family Income
Excellent
$106,183
Tragic
$91,087
Median Household Income
Good
$86,418
Tragic
$78,803
Median Earnings
Excellent
$47,640
Tragic
$42,280
Median Male Earnings
Excellent
$56,300
Tragic
$48,093
Median Female Earnings
Average
$39,891
Tragic
$36,492
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$50,379
Good
$52,626
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Excellent
$97,237
Tragic
$85,144
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Excellent
$103,536
Tragic
$90,951
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Average
$60,967
Tragic
$56,321
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.4%
Exceptional
23.1%

Luxembourger vs Central American Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Central American communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (3.9% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 73.8%), family poverty (7.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 55.5%), and receiving food stamps (9.1% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 54.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (13.4% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 1.5%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.9% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 4.9%), and single father poverty (17.1% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 7.2%).
Luxembourger vs Central American Poverty
Poverty MetricLuxembourgerCentral American
Poverty
Exceptional
10.6%
Tragic
14.6%
Families
Exceptional
7.2%
Tragic
11.2%
Males
Exceptional
9.5%
Tragic
13.2%
Females
Exceptional
11.6%
Tragic
16.0%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
20.9%
Good
19.9%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.1%
Tragic
15.5%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
14.9%
Tragic
20.6%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.6%
Tragic
20.0%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.8%
Tragic
20.1%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.3%
Tragic
20.2%
Single Males
Tragic
13.4%
Poor
13.2%
Single Females
Excellent
20.4%
Tragic
23.0%
Single Fathers
Tragic
17.1%
Excellent
16.0%
Single Mothers
Excellent
28.5%
Tragic
31.8%
Married Couples
Exceptional
3.9%
Tragic
6.7%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.2%
Tragic
13.4%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
10.8%
Tragic
14.7%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.1%
Tragic
14.1%

Luxembourger vs Central American Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Central American communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (4.4% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 35.2%), unemployment (4.3% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 31.8%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (15.1% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 24.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 10.2%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 12.4%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 12.4%).
Luxembourger vs Central American Unemployment
Unemployment MetricLuxembourgerCentral American
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
5.7%
Males
Exceptional
4.5%
Tragic
5.6%
Females
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
5.9%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.0%
Tragic
12.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
15.1%
Tragic
18.8%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.1%
Tragic
10.6%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Tragic
7.0%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
5.9%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Tragic
4.8%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
5.2%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
5.7%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
5.5%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.7%
Average
8.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.6%
Tragic
8.2%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.3%
Tragic
9.4%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
6.2%

Luxembourger vs Central American Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Central American communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (45.3% compared to 34.8%, a difference of 30.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (79.0% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 5.2%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (85.0% compared to 81.7%, a difference of 4.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (66.7% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 1.0%), in labor force | age 30-34 (86.6% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 3.2%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (81.9% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 3.5%).
Luxembourger vs Central American Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricLuxembourgerCentral American
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.7%
Exceptional
66.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
81.9%
Tragic
79.1%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
45.3%
Tragic
34.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
79.0%
Average
75.0%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
86.9%
Tragic
83.7%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
86.6%
Tragic
84.0%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
86.4%
Tragic
83.5%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
85.0%
Tragic
81.7%

Luxembourger vs Central American Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Central American communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.6% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 36.8%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 27.9%), and births to unmarried women (29.4% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 24.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.3% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 4.3%), divorced or separated (11.3% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 7.0%), and family households with children (27.0% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 7.8%).
Luxembourger vs Central American Family Structure
Family Structure MetricLuxembourgerCentral American
Family Households
Tragic
63.3%
Exceptional
66.0%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
27.0%
Exceptional
29.1%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
48.5%
Tragic
43.9%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.10
Exceptional
3.41
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Tragic
2.9%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.6%
Tragic
7.6%
Currently Married
Exceptional
49.3%
Tragic
43.3%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.3%
Fair
12.1%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
29.4%
Tragic
36.7%

Luxembourger vs Central American Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Central American communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 101.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.1% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 8.0%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (20.9% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 2.1%), 1 or more vehicles in household (94.8% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 6.2%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 7.4%).
Luxembourger vs Central American Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricLuxembourgerCentral American
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
5.4%
Fair
10.8%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
94.8%
Fair
89.2%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.1%
Fair
54.7%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
20.9%
Exceptional
20.5%
4+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
6.6%
Exceptional
7.1%

Luxembourger vs Central American Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Central American communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 113.9%), doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 33.0%), and professional degree (4.6% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 28.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 1.9%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 2.0%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 2.0%).
Luxembourger vs Central American Education Level
Education Level MetricLuxembourgerCentral American
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.6%
Tragic
3.4%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.5%
Tragic
96.6%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.5%
Tragic
96.6%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Tragic
96.5%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
96.4%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
96.1%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
95.5%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Tragic
95.1%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Tragic
94.5%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.2%
Tragic
92.1%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.0%
Tragic
91.6%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.3%
Tragic
90.4%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.4%
Tragic
88.4%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.5%
Tragic
86.9%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
93.3%
Tragic
85.2%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.7%
Tragic
82.5%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.6%
Tragic
79.2%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
68.2%
Tragic
57.7%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
62.1%
Tragic
52.1%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
48.9%
Tragic
39.4%
Bachelor's Degree
Excellent
39.8%
Tragic
31.9%
Master's Degree
Good
15.3%
Tragic
12.2%
Professional Degree
Good
4.6%
Tragic
3.6%
Doctorate Degree
Excellent
1.9%
Tragic
1.5%

Luxembourger vs Central American Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Central American communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (1.9% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 18.8%), hearing disability (3.2% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 18.7%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.4% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 17.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (11.3% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 0.070%), female disability (11.6% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 2.7%), and male disability (11.1% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 2.9%).
Luxembourger vs Central American Disability
Disability MetricLuxembourgerCentral American
Disability
Exceptional
11.3%
Exceptional
11.4%
Males
Good
11.1%
Exceptional
10.8%
Females
Exceptional
11.6%
Exceptional
11.9%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.3%
Excellent
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.3%
Excellent
5.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
6.9%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.6%
Average
11.2%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.4%
Tragic
25.1%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
44.8%
Tragic
48.8%
Vision
Exceptional
1.9%
Tragic
2.3%
Hearing
Tragic
3.2%
Exceptional
2.7%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.4%
Tragic
17.7%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.6%
Good
6.0%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.2%
Tragic
2.5%