Pima vs Central American Community Comparison
COMPARE
Pima
Central American
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Pima
Central Americans
1,700
SOCIAL INDEX
14.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
291st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,952
SOCIAL INDEX
17.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
278th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Central American Integration in Pima Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 60,972,797 people shows a significant negative correlation between the proportion of Central Americans within Pima communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.675. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pima within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.171% in Central Americans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pima corresponds to a decrease of 171.2 Central Americans.
Pima vs Central American Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Pima and Central American communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($30,644 compared to $38,560, a difference of 25.8%), median household income ($63,262 compared to $78,803, a difference of 24.6%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($73,365 compared to $90,951, a difference of 24.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,503 compared to $52,626, a difference of 2.2%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,821 compared to $85,144, a difference of 2.8%), and median female earnings ($35,326 compared to $36,492, a difference of 3.3%).
Income Metric | Pima | Central American |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $30,644 | Tragic $38,560 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $77,431 | Tragic $91,087 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $63,262 | Tragic $78,803 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $38,285 | Tragic $42,280 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $42,357 | Tragic $48,093 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $35,326 | Tragic $36,492 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Poor $51,503 | Good $52,626 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $82,821 | Tragic $85,144 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $73,365 | Tragic $90,951 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $50,539 | Tragic $56,321 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 21.1% | Exceptional 23.1% |
Pima vs Central American Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pima and Central American communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (11.4% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 69.2%), family poverty (18.4% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 63.6%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (25.3% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 63.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.8% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 8.0%), single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 31.8%, a difference of 21.4%), and single female poverty (30.3% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 32.0%).
Poverty Metric | Pima | Central American |
Poverty | Tragic 21.9% | Tragic 14.6% |
Families | Tragic 18.4% | Tragic 11.2% |
Males | Tragic 20.4% | Tragic 13.2% |
Females | Tragic 23.6% | Tragic 16.0% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 28.4% | Good 19.9% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 25.3% | Tragic 15.5% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 27.4% | Tragic 20.6% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 29.0% | Tragic 20.0% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 29.7% | Tragic 20.1% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 28.2% | Tragic 20.2% |
Single Males | Tragic 20.2% | Poor 13.2% |
Single Females | Tragic 30.3% | Tragic 23.0% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 14.8% | Excellent 16.0% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 38.6% | Tragic 31.8% |
Married Couples | Tragic 11.4% | Tragic 6.7% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 19.8% | Tragic 13.4% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 23.9% | Tragic 14.7% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 19.0% | Tragic 14.1% |
Pima vs Central American Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pima and Central American communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (11.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 131.2%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (18.9% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 100.9%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (11.7% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 88.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 5.0%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 8.6%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.3% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 13.9%).
Unemployment Metric | Pima | Central American |
Unemployment | Tragic 8.2% | Tragic 5.7% |
Males | Tragic 8.3% | Tragic 5.6% |
Females | Tragic 9.3% | Tragic 5.9% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 16.2% | Tragic 12.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 23.1% | Tragic 18.8% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 14.2% | Tragic 10.6% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 11.8% | Tragic 7.0% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 9.6% | Tragic 5.9% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 11.8% | Tragic 5.1% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 6.4% | Tragic 4.8% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 6.6% | Tragic 5.1% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Excellent 4.8% | Tragic 5.2% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 6.6% | Tragic 5.7% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 6.3% | Tragic 5.5% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.2% | Average 8.8% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 13.4% | Tragic 8.2% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 18.9% | Tragic 9.4% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 11.7% | Tragic 6.2% |
Pima vs Central American Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pima and Central American communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (57.4% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 15.1%), in labor force | age 20-64 (69.0% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 14.6%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (74.3% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 34.8%, a difference of 2.2%), in labor force | age 30-34 (79.0% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 6.3%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (69.0% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 8.7%).
Labor Participation Metric | Pima | Central American |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 57.4% | Exceptional 66.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 69.0% | Tragic 79.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 34.1% | Tragic 34.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 69.0% | Average 75.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 74.3% | Tragic 83.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 79.0% | Tragic 84.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 74.8% | Tragic 83.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 72.8% | Tragic 81.7% |
Pima vs Central American Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pima and Central American communities in the United States are seen in single father households (4.2% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 46.3%), births to unmarried women (51.5% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 40.2%), and married-couple households (35.6% compared to 43.9%, a difference of 23.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.9% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 0.10%), divorced or separated (12.9% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 6.0%), and family households with children (27.1% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 7.5%).
Family Structure Metric | Pima | Central American |
Family Households | Exceptional 65.9% | Exceptional 66.0% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 27.1% | Exceptional 29.1% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 35.6% | Tragic 43.9% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.75 | Exceptional 3.41 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 4.2% | Tragic 2.9% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 8.3% | Tragic 7.6% |
Currently Married | Tragic 35.9% | Tragic 43.3% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 12.9% | Fair 12.1% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 51.5% | Tragic 36.7% |
Pima vs Central American Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pima and Central American communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 30.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 10.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.3% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 3.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 5.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 7.7%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Pima | Central American |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 14.1% | Fair 10.8% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 86.3% | Fair 89.2% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 52.0% | Fair 54.7% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.0% | Exceptional 20.5% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.9% | Exceptional 7.1% |
Pima vs Central American Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pima and Central American communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 60.6%), bachelor's degree (23.2% compared to 31.9%, a difference of 37.5%), and master's degree (9.2% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 31.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (84.6% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.73%), high school diploma (81.6% compared to 82.5%, a difference of 1.1%), and 11th grade (88.3% compared to 86.9%, a difference of 1.5%).
Education Level Metric | Pima | Central American |
No Schooling Completed | Average 2.1% | Tragic 3.4% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 96.6% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 96.6% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 96.5% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 96.4% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Tragic 96.1% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 97.7% | Tragic 95.5% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Tragic 95.1% |
6th Grade | Excellent 97.2% | Tragic 94.5% |
7th Grade | Good 96.1% | Tragic 92.1% |
8th Grade | Fair 95.6% | Tragic 91.6% |
9th Grade | Tragic 93.9% | Tragic 90.4% |
10th Grade | Tragic 91.2% | Tragic 88.4% |
11th Grade | Tragic 88.3% | Tragic 86.9% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 84.6% | Tragic 85.2% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 81.6% | Tragic 82.5% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 76.4% | Tragic 79.2% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 51.4% | Tragic 57.7% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 45.6% | Tragic 52.1% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 30.2% | Tragic 39.4% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 23.2% | Tragic 31.9% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 9.2% | Tragic 12.2% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.3% | Tragic 3.6% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.3% | Tragic 1.5% |
Pima vs Central American Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pima and Central American communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (38.6% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 53.6%), vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 44.6%), and disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 44.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.8% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 6.4%), self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 9.7%), and disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 11.1%).
Disability Metric | Pima | Central American |
Disability | Tragic 13.7% | Exceptional 11.4% |
Males | Tragic 12.8% | Exceptional 10.8% |
Females | Tragic 14.8% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.1% | Excellent 1.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.2% | Excellent 5.5% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.7% | Exceptional 6.2% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.1% | Average 11.2% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 38.6% | Tragic 25.1% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 55.8% | Tragic 48.8% |
Vision | Tragic 3.3% | Tragic 2.3% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.7% | Exceptional 2.7% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.8% | Tragic 17.7% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.2% | Good 6.0% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.8% | Tragic 2.5% |