Immigrants from Jordan vs British West Indian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 88,701,677 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of British West Indians within Immigrant from Jordan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.105. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Jordan within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.035% in British West Indians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Jordan corresponds to a decrease of 35.1 British West Indians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and British West Indian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 46.0%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($106,164 compared to $85,571, a difference of 24.1%), and householder income over 65 years ($63,041 compared to $51,463, a difference of 22.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,370 compared to $51,844, a difference of 0.92%), median female earnings ($40,977 compared to $40,299, a difference of 1.7%), and median earnings ($48,673 compared to $44,552, a difference of 9.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and British West Indian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.7% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 67.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.2% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 52.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 49.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.5% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 7.1%), single father poverty (16.2% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 9.2%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.1% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 10.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and British West Indian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.5% compared to 24.0%, a difference of 45.3%), male unemployment (5.1% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 43.0%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.3% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 37.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 7.7%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.5% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 11.2%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 13.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and British West Indian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.9% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 27.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 70.0%, a difference of 8.1%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.4% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 0.48%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and British West Indian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.0% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 38.7%), births to unmarried women (29.0% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 31.2%), and married-couple households (47.7% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 24.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 0.59%), average family size (3.24 compared to 3.32, a difference of 2.3%), and family households (65.0% compared to 62.8%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and British West Indian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 29.7%, a difference of 243.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 88.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.9% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 73.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 70.4%, a difference of 29.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 35.4%, a difference of 61.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.9% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 73.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and British West Indian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 39.6%), no schooling completed (2.0% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 34.4%), and professional degree (4.7% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 24.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.72%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.73%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.73%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and British West Indian communities in the United States are seen in ambulatory disability (5.7% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 21.5%), self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 19.7%), and hearing disability (2.9% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 18.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (10.6% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 5.2%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 5.3%), and disability age over 75 (46.2% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 5.4%).