Choctaw vs British West Indian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Choctaw
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
British West Indian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Choctaw

British West Indians

Fair
Tragic
2,496
SOCIAL INDEX
22.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
254th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
938
SOCIAL INDEX
6.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
333rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

British West Indian Integration in Choctaw Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 96,709,956 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of British West Indians within Choctaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.515. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Choctaw within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.006% in British West Indians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Choctaw corresponds to a decrease of 5.6 British West Indians.
Choctaw Integration in British West Indian Communities

Choctaw vs British West Indian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Choctaw and British West Indian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (28.1% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 56.2%), median female earnings ($33,775 compared to $40,299, a difference of 19.3%), and householder income under 25 years ($45,450 compared to $51,844, a difference of 14.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($53,060 compared to $51,463, a difference of 3.1%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,287 compared to $85,571, a difference of 4.0%), and median male earnings ($47,729 compared to $49,636, a difference of 4.0%).
Choctaw vs British West Indian Income
Income MetricChoctawBritish West Indian
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$35,999
Tragic
$40,330
Median Family Income
Tragic
$84,835
Tragic
$88,987
Median Household Income
Tragic
$69,947
Tragic
$75,647
Median Earnings
Tragic
$40,270
Tragic
$44,552
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$47,729
Tragic
$49,636
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$33,775
Good
$40,299
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$45,450
Fair
$51,844
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$78,168
Tragic
$85,565
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$82,287
Tragic
$85,571
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$53,060
Tragic
$51,463
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
28.1%
Exceptional
18.0%

Choctaw vs British West Indian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Choctaw and British West Indian communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.5% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 39.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.4% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 37.2%), and receiving food stamps (13.6% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 31.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among girls under 16 (21.1% compared to 21.3%, a difference of 0.57%), child poverty among boys under 16 (21.3% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 1.1%), and female poverty (16.8% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 1.3%).
Choctaw vs British West Indian Poverty
Poverty MetricChoctawBritish West Indian
Poverty
Tragic
15.6%
Tragic
15.9%
Families
Tragic
11.6%
Tragic
12.4%
Males
Tragic
14.4%
Tragic
14.6%
Females
Tragic
16.8%
Tragic
17.0%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
24.3%
Tragic
21.2%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
18.1%
Tragic
15.6%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
23.5%
Tragic
21.4%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
21.0%
Tragic
21.3%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
21.3%
Tragic
21.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
21.1%
Tragic
21.3%
Single Males
Tragic
17.0%
Tragic
13.4%
Single Females
Tragic
27.2%
Tragic
22.8%
Single Fathers
Tragic
20.7%
Tragic
17.7%
Single Mothers
Tragic
36.4%
Tragic
31.5%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.3%
Tragic
7.1%
Seniors Over 65 years
Poor
11.4%
Tragic
15.6%
Seniors Over 75 years
Fair
12.5%
Tragic
17.4%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
13.6%
Tragic
17.9%

Choctaw vs British West Indian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Choctaw and British West Indian communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (5.6% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 30.1%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.6% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 29.1%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.1% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 28.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.9% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 2.5%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 5.5%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.4% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 9.5%).
Choctaw vs British West Indian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricChoctawBritish West Indian
Unemployment
Poor
5.4%
Tragic
6.8%
Males
Tragic
5.6%
Tragic
7.3%
Females
Poor
5.4%
Tragic
6.4%
Youth < 25
Tragic
12.1%
Tragic
15.5%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
19.0%
Tragic
24.0%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
10.6%
Tragic
13.7%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.5%
Tragic
8.4%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.4%
Tragic
7.0%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.3%
Tragic
6.0%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
4.7%
Tragic
5.7%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.0%
Tragic
5.3%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
5.5%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
5.8%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
5.8%
Seniors > 75
Fair
8.8%
Exceptional
7.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
9.8%
Tragic
8.3%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.9%
Tragic
9.7%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.9%
Tragic
6.6%

Choctaw vs British West Indian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Choctaw and British West Indian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 30.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.7% compared to 70.0%, a difference of 6.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (61.5% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 4.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (81.0% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 2.7%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.4% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 3.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (78.2% compared to 81.2%, a difference of 3.9%).
Choctaw vs British West Indian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricChoctawBritish West Indian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
61.5%
Tragic
64.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
75.4%
Tragic
78.4%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.0%
Tragic
29.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Fair
74.7%
Tragic
70.0%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
81.0%
Tragic
83.2%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
81.4%
Tragic
84.0%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
80.5%
Tragic
84.0%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
78.2%
Tragic
81.2%

Choctaw vs British West Indian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Choctaw and British West Indian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.7% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 24.4%), married-couple households (46.0% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 19.9%), and single mother households (7.0% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 19.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (36.9% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 3.0%), average family size (3.21 compared to 3.32, a difference of 3.3%), and family households (64.9% compared to 62.8%, a difference of 3.4%).
Choctaw vs British West Indian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricChoctawBritish West Indian
Family Households
Exceptional
64.9%
Tragic
62.8%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.1%
Tragic
26.0%
Married-couple Households
Fair
46.0%
Tragic
38.3%
Average Family Size
Fair
3.21
Exceptional
3.32
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.7%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.0%
Tragic
8.4%
Currently Married
Fair
46.3%
Tragic
39.8%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
14.1%
Tragic
12.4%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
36.9%
Tragic
38.0%

Choctaw vs British West Indian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Choctaw and British West Indian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 29.7%, a difference of 277.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 125.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 101.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.2% compared to 70.4%, a difference of 31.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.3% compared to 35.4%, a difference of 67.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 101.0%).
Choctaw vs British West Indian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricChoctawBritish West Indian
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.9%
Tragic
29.7%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.2%
Tragic
70.4%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.3%
Tragic
35.4%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
23.0%
Tragic
11.4%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.8%
Tragic
3.5%

Choctaw vs British West Indian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Choctaw and British West Indian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.8% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 50.5%), master's degree (11.0% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 25.2%), and professional degree (3.2% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 18.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (59.3% compared to 59.5%, a difference of 0.34%), doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 0.79%), and nursery school (98.3% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 1.0%).
Choctaw vs British West Indian Education Level
Education Level MetricChoctawBritish West Indian
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.8%
Tragic
2.7%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
97.3%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
97.3%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
97.2%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
97.2%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Tragic
97.0%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Tragic
96.7%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.7%
Tragic
96.5%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.5%
Tragic
96.0%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.5%
Tragic
94.8%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.2%
Tragic
94.4%
9th Grade
Excellent
95.1%
Tragic
93.2%
10th Grade
Fair
93.6%
Tragic
91.8%
11th Grade
Tragic
91.8%
Tragic
90.3%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
89.8%
Tragic
88.5%
High School Diploma
Tragic
87.8%
Tragic
85.9%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
83.1%
Tragic
82.0%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
59.3%
Tragic
59.5%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
52.3%
Tragic
54.5%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
37.8%
Tragic
42.4%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
29.4%
Tragic
34.5%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.0%
Tragic
13.8%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.2%
Tragic
3.8%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.4%
Tragic
1.5%

Choctaw vs British West Indian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Choctaw and British West Indian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 0.99%, a difference of 89.1%), hearing disability (4.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 87.2%), and disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 50.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.4% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 1.3%), self-care disability (3.0% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 7.2%), and disability age over 75 (52.7% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 8.2%).
Choctaw vs British West Indian Disability
Disability MetricChoctawBritish West Indian
Disability
Tragic
15.4%
Poor
12.0%
Males
Tragic
15.4%
Good
11.1%
Females
Tragic
15.4%
Tragic
12.7%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.9%
Exceptional
0.99%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.9%
Tragic
5.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
9.0%
Exceptional
6.0%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
16.4%
Tragic
11.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
30.2%
Tragic
24.7%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
52.7%
Tragic
48.7%
Vision
Tragic
3.3%
Tragic
2.4%
Hearing
Tragic
4.5%
Exceptional
2.4%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.4%
Tragic
18.2%
Ambulatory
Tragic
8.3%
Tragic
7.0%
Self-Care
Tragic
3.0%
Tragic
2.8%