Choctaw vs Bermudan Community Comparison

COMPARE

Choctaw
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlbanianAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYaquiYugoslavianZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Bermudan
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Choctaw

Bermudans

Fair
Fair
2,496
SOCIAL INDEX
22.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
254th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,838
SOCIAL INDEX
25.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
241st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Bermudan Integration in Choctaw Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 44,028,514 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Bermudans within Choctaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.282. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Choctaw within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.204% in Bermudans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Choctaw corresponds to a decrease of 203.7 Bermudans.
Choctaw Integration in Bermudan Communities

Choctaw vs Bermudan Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Bermudan communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (28.1% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 21.8%), per capita income ($35,999 compared to $42,911, a difference of 19.2%), and median female earnings ($33,775 compared to $39,418, a difference of 16.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($45,450 compared to $47,359, a difference of 4.2%), householder income over 65 years ($53,060 compared to $58,171, a difference of 9.6%), and median male earnings ($47,729 compared to $52,465, a difference of 9.9%).
Choctaw vs Bermudan Income
Income MetricChoctawBermudan
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$35,999
Fair
$42,911
Median Family Income
Tragic
$84,835
Tragic
$97,577
Median Household Income
Tragic
$69,947
Tragic
$80,406
Median Earnings
Tragic
$40,270
Fair
$45,593
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$47,729
Poor
$52,465
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$33,775
Fair
$39,418
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$45,450
Tragic
$47,359
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$78,168
Tragic
$88,231
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$82,287
Tragic
$94,197
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$53,060
Tragic
$58,171
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
28.1%
Exceptional
23.1%

Choctaw vs Bermudan Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Bermudan communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (18.1% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 33.1%), single male poverty (17.0% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 29.5%), and single father poverty (20.7% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 22.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.5% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 3.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.4% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 4.5%), and receiving food stamps (13.6% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 5.0%).
Choctaw vs Bermudan Poverty
Poverty MetricChoctawBermudan
Poverty
Tragic
15.6%
Tragic
13.3%
Families
Tragic
11.6%
Tragic
9.9%
Males
Tragic
14.4%
Tragic
12.2%
Females
Tragic
16.8%
Tragic
14.4%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
24.3%
Tragic
21.9%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
18.1%
Average
13.6%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
23.5%
Tragic
19.2%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
21.0%
Tragic
18.0%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
21.3%
Tragic
18.1%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
21.1%
Tragic
18.1%
Single Males
Tragic
17.0%
Poor
13.1%
Single Females
Tragic
27.2%
Tragic
22.3%
Single Fathers
Tragic
20.7%
Tragic
16.9%
Single Mothers
Tragic
36.4%
Tragic
30.6%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.3%
Average
5.2%
Seniors Over 65 years
Poor
11.4%
Tragic
11.9%
Seniors Over 75 years
Fair
12.5%
Tragic
12.9%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
13.6%
Tragic
13.0%

Choctaw vs Bermudan Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Bermudan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 23.1%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 21.0%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.6% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 17.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.50%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.8% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 1.6%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 2.1%).
Choctaw vs Bermudan Unemployment
Unemployment MetricChoctawBermudan
Unemployment
Poor
5.4%
Tragic
5.6%
Males
Tragic
5.6%
Tragic
5.9%
Females
Poor
5.4%
Tragic
5.4%
Youth < 25
Tragic
12.1%
Tragic
13.0%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
19.0%
Average
17.6%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
10.6%
Tragic
12.5%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.5%
Tragic
7.0%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.4%
Tragic
5.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.3%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
4.7%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.0%
Poor
4.9%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.8%
Average
4.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
6.3%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
5.9%
Seniors > 75
Fair
8.8%
Poor
8.9%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
9.8%
Tragic
8.7%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.9%
Tragic
10.5%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.9%
Tragic
6.1%

Choctaw vs Bermudan Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Bermudan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (61.5% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 7.5%), in labor force | age 45-54 (78.2% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 6.3%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (81.0% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 6.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.7% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 0.78%), in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 36.9%, a difference of 2.8%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.4% compared to 85.9%, a difference of 5.6%).
Choctaw vs Bermudan Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricChoctawBermudan
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
61.5%
Exceptional
66.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
75.4%
Exceptional
80.0%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.0%
Good
36.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Fair
74.7%
Tragic
74.1%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
81.0%
Exceptional
86.0%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
81.4%
Exceptional
85.9%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
80.5%
Exceptional
85.3%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
78.2%
Excellent
83.1%

Choctaw vs Bermudan Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Bermudan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.7% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 27.5%), divorced or separated (14.1% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 11.5%), and married-couple households (46.0% compared to 42.4%, a difference of 8.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.21 compared to 3.20, a difference of 0.54%), single mother households (7.0% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 3.4%), and births to unmarried women (36.9% compared to 35.5%, a difference of 3.8%).
Choctaw vs Bermudan Family Structure
Family Structure MetricChoctawBermudan
Family Households
Exceptional
64.9%
Tragic
62.2%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.1%
Tragic
26.3%
Married-couple Households
Fair
46.0%
Tragic
42.4%
Average Family Size
Fair
3.21
Poor
3.20
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.7%
Exceptional
2.1%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.0%
Tragic
7.3%
Currently Married
Fair
46.3%
Tragic
43.5%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
14.1%
Tragic
12.7%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
36.9%
Tragic
35.5%

Choctaw vs Bermudan Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Bermudan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 62.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 38.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 29.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.2% compared to 87.5%, a difference of 5.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.3% compared to 50.6%, a difference of 17.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 29.5%).
Choctaw vs Bermudan Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricChoctawBermudan
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.9%
Tragic
12.8%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.2%
Tragic
87.5%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.3%
Tragic
50.6%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
23.0%
Tragic
17.8%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.8%
Tragic
5.6%

Choctaw vs Bermudan Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Bermudan communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (11.0% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 39.8%), professional degree (3.2% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 35.1%), and bachelor's degree (29.4% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 29.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (95.1% compared to 95.0%, a difference of 0.16%), nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.29%), and 2nd grade (98.2% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.29%).
Choctaw vs Bermudan Education Level
Education Level MetricChoctawBermudan
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.8%
Fair
2.1%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.3%
Average
98.0%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.3%
Average
98.0%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Average
97.9%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Average
97.9%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Good
97.8%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Good
97.6%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.7%
Average
97.4%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.5%
Average
97.1%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.5%
Good
96.1%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.2%
Good
95.8%
9th Grade
Excellent
95.1%
Good
95.0%
10th Grade
Fair
93.6%
Good
93.9%
11th Grade
Tragic
91.8%
Good
92.6%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
89.8%
Average
91.2%
High School Diploma
Tragic
87.8%
Good
89.3%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
83.1%
Average
85.8%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
59.3%
Average
65.2%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
52.3%
Average
59.3%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
37.8%
Average
46.2%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
29.4%
Average
38.0%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.0%
Good
15.4%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.2%
Average
4.4%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.4%
Average
1.8%

Choctaw vs Bermudan Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Bermudan communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.5% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 58.0%), vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 46.8%), and disability age 35 to 64 (16.4% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 37.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.4% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 1.7%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.9% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 8.7%), and disability age over 75 (52.7% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 12.4%).
Choctaw vs Bermudan Disability
Disability MetricChoctawBermudan
Disability
Tragic
15.4%
Tragic
12.3%
Males
Tragic
15.4%
Tragic
11.8%
Females
Tragic
15.4%
Tragic
12.7%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.9%
Tragic
1.4%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.9%
Tragic
6.4%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
9.0%
Tragic
7.3%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
16.4%
Tragic
11.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
30.2%
Tragic
24.2%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
52.7%
Excellent
46.9%
Vision
Tragic
3.3%
Tragic
2.2%
Hearing
Tragic
4.5%
Excellent
2.9%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.4%
Tragic
18.1%
Ambulatory
Tragic
8.3%
Tragic
6.5%
Self-Care
Tragic
3.0%
Tragic
2.6%