Pima vs Bermudan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 28,091,708 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Bermudans within Pima communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 1.000. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pima within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.042% in Bermudans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pima corresponds to an increase of 42.4 Bermudans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Pima and Bermudan communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($30,644 compared to $42,911, a difference of 40.0%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($73,365 compared to $94,197, a difference of 28.4%), and median household income ($63,262 compared to $80,406, a difference of 27.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,821 compared to $88,231, a difference of 6.5%), householder income under 25 years ($51,503 compared to $47,359, a difference of 8.7%), and wage/income gap (21.1% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 9.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pima and Bermudan communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (11.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 119.3%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (25.3% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 86.4%), and family poverty (18.4% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 86.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.8% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 14.8%), single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 26.1%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (28.4% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 29.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pima and Bermudan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (11.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 137.3%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (11.7% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 92.4%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (18.9% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 79.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.7%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 3.0%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.6% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 5.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pima and Bermudan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (69.0% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 15.8%), in labor force | age 25-29 (74.3% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 15.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (57.4% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 15.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (69.0% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 7.4%), in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 36.9%, a difference of 8.4%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (79.0% compared to 85.9%, a difference of 8.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pima and Bermudan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (4.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 96.2%), births to unmarried women (51.5% compared to 35.5%, a difference of 44.9%), and currently married (35.9% compared to 43.5%, a difference of 21.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.9% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 1.6%), family households with children (27.1% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 3.0%), and family households (65.9% compared to 62.2%, a difference of 6.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pima and Bermudan communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 40.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 24.1%), and no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 10.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.3% compared to 87.5%, a difference of 1.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 50.6%, a difference of 2.8%), and no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 10.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pima and Bermudan communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (9.2% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 66.7%), bachelor's degree (23.2% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 63.7%), and associate's degree (30.2% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 52.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 7th grade (96.1% compared to 96.1%, a difference of 0.010%), 6th grade (97.2% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.17%), and 4th grade (97.7% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.19%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pima and Bermudan communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (38.6% compared to 24.2%, a difference of 59.8%), vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 48.4%), and disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 35.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (6.2% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 2.9%), cognitive disability (18.8% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 3.7%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.7% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 5.3%).