Choctaw vs Yup'ik Community Comparison

COMPARE

Choctaw
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Yup'ik
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Choctaw

Yup'ik

Fair
Fair
2,496
SOCIAL INDEX
22.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
254th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,388
SOCIAL INDEX
21.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
262nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Yup'ik Integration in Choctaw Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 35,158,143 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Yup'ik within Choctaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.293. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Choctaw within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.115% in Yup'ik. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Choctaw corresponds to a decrease of 115.5 Yup'ik.
Choctaw Integration in Yup'ik Communities

Choctaw vs Yup'ik Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Yup'ik communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($47,729 compared to $39,504, a difference of 20.8%), householder income under 25 years ($45,450 compared to $54,732, a difference of 20.4%), and per capita income ($35,999 compared to $30,518, a difference of 18.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median household income ($69,947 compared to $69,695, a difference of 0.36%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,287 compared to $81,000, a difference of 1.6%), and median female earnings ($33,775 compared to $32,730, a difference of 3.2%).
Choctaw vs Yup'ik Income
Income MetricChoctawYup'ik
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$35,999
Tragic
$30,518
Median Family Income
Tragic
$84,835
Tragic
$79,290
Median Household Income
Tragic
$69,947
Tragic
$69,695
Median Earnings
Tragic
$40,270
Tragic
$35,942
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$47,729
Tragic
$39,504
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$33,775
Tragic
$32,730
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$45,450
Exceptional
$54,732
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$78,168
Tragic
$73,688
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$82,287
Tragic
$81,000
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$53,060
Average
$60,727
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
28.1%
Exceptional
24.7%

Choctaw vs Yup'ik Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Yup'ik communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (13.6% compared to 32.7%, a difference of 140.1%), married-couple family poverty (6.3% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 112.7%), and single male poverty (17.0% compared to 31.6%, a difference of 86.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (27.2% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 2.3%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.3% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 11.4%), and single mother poverty (36.4% compared to 32.5%, a difference of 12.2%).
Choctaw vs Yup'ik Poverty
Poverty MetricChoctawYup'ik
Poverty
Tragic
15.6%
Tragic
20.8%
Families
Tragic
11.6%
Tragic
18.7%
Males
Tragic
14.4%
Tragic
20.4%
Females
Tragic
16.8%
Tragic
21.5%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
24.3%
Tragic
27.0%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
18.1%
Tragic
24.3%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
23.5%
Tragic
27.7%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
21.0%
Tragic
25.1%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
21.3%
Tragic
24.7%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
21.1%
Tragic
25.8%
Single Males
Tragic
17.0%
Tragic
31.6%
Single Females
Tragic
27.2%
Tragic
26.6%
Single Fathers
Tragic
20.7%
Tragic
32.5%
Single Mothers
Tragic
36.4%
Tragic
32.5%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.3%
Tragic
13.4%
Seniors Over 65 years
Poor
11.4%
Tragic
14.1%
Seniors Over 75 years
Fair
12.5%
Tragic
15.8%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
13.6%
Tragic
32.7%

Choctaw vs Yup'ik Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Yup'ik communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (5.6% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 192.9%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.4% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 187.3%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.0% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 177.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.8% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 44.9%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 85.7%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.9% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 87.4%).
Choctaw vs Yup'ik Unemployment
Unemployment MetricChoctawYup'ik
Unemployment
Poor
5.4%
Tragic
13.6%
Males
Tragic
5.6%
Tragic
16.4%
Females
Poor
5.4%
Tragic
10.9%
Youth < 25
Tragic
12.1%
Tragic
23.7%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
19.0%
Tragic
41.0%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
10.6%
Tragic
20.9%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.5%
Tragic
17.9%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.4%
Tragic
18.5%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.3%
Tragic
14.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
4.7%
Tragic
11.9%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.0%
Tragic
13.9%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
11.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
9.5%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
9.1%
Seniors > 75
Fair
8.8%
Tragic
12.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
9.8%
Tragic
21.1%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.9%
Tragic
18.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.9%
Tragic
11.0%

Choctaw vs Yup'ik Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Yup'ik communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 14.2%), in labor force | age 25-29 (81.0% compared to 73.1%, a difference of 10.8%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.4% compared to 76.4%, a difference of 6.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (78.2% compared to 78.6%, a difference of 0.61%), in labor force | age > 16 (61.5% compared to 62.7%, a difference of 2.0%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (75.4% compared to 73.2%, a difference of 3.0%).
Choctaw vs Yup'ik Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricChoctawYup'ik
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
61.5%
Tragic
62.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
75.4%
Tragic
73.2%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.0%
Tragic
33.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Fair
74.7%
Tragic
70.9%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
81.0%
Tragic
73.1%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
81.4%
Tragic
76.4%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
80.5%
Tragic
77.3%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
78.2%
Tragic
78.6%

Choctaw vs Yup'ik Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Yup'ik communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.7% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 98.4%), births to unmarried women (36.9% compared to 56.4%, a difference of 53.0%), and single mother households (7.0% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 42.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (46.0% compared to 44.1%, a difference of 4.3%), family households (64.9% compared to 72.4%, a difference of 11.6%), and currently married (46.3% compared to 39.9%, a difference of 15.9%).
Choctaw vs Yup'ik Family Structure
Family Structure MetricChoctawYup'ik
Family Households
Exceptional
64.9%
Exceptional
72.4%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.1%
Exceptional
37.0%
Married-couple Households
Fair
46.0%
Tragic
44.1%
Average Family Size
Fair
3.21
Exceptional
4.00
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.7%
Tragic
5.4%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.0%
Tragic
10.0%
Currently Married
Fair
46.3%
Tragic
39.9%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
14.1%
Exceptional
10.3%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
36.9%
Tragic
56.4%

Choctaw vs Yup'ik Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Yup'ik communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 481.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.3% compared to 34.9%, a difference of 69.6%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (92.2% compared to 58.4%, a difference of 57.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 37.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 55.0%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (92.2% compared to 58.4%, a difference of 57.8%).
Choctaw vs Yup'ik Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricChoctawYup'ik
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.9%
Tragic
45.9%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.2%
Tragic
58.4%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.3%
Tragic
34.9%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
23.0%
Tragic
14.8%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.8%
Tragic
5.7%

Choctaw vs Yup'ik Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Yup'ik communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (29.4% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 51.6%), associate's degree (37.8% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 51.3%), and no schooling completed (1.8% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 47.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (95.1% compared to 95.2%, a difference of 0.020%), 10th grade (93.6% compared to 93.6%, a difference of 0.060%), and 5th grade (97.7% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.48%).
Choctaw vs Yup'ik Education Level
Education Level MetricChoctawYup'ik
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.8%
Exceptional
1.2%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
99.2%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
99.2%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
99.2%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
99.2%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
99.0%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Exceptional
98.5%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.7%
Exceptional
98.2%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.5%
Exceptional
98.0%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.5%
Exceptional
97.4%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.2%
Exceptional
97.0%
9th Grade
Excellent
95.1%
Excellent
95.2%
10th Grade
Fair
93.6%
Fair
93.6%
11th Grade
Tragic
91.8%
Tragic
91.2%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
89.8%
Tragic
87.6%
High School Diploma
Tragic
87.8%
Tragic
86.1%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
83.1%
Tragic
80.0%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
59.3%
Tragic
45.8%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
52.3%
Tragic
39.4%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
37.8%
Tragic
25.0%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
29.4%
Tragic
19.4%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.0%
Tragic
8.5%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.2%
Tragic
2.9%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.4%
Tragic
1.3%

Choctaw vs Yup'ik Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Yup'ik communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 141.6%), self-care disability (3.0% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 62.0%), and ambulatory disability (8.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 61.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 35 to 64 (16.4% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 3.2%), cognitive disability (18.4% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 9.4%), and disability age over 75 (52.7% compared to 61.1%, a difference of 16.0%).
Choctaw vs Yup'ik Disability
Disability MetricChoctawYup'ik
Disability
Tragic
15.4%
Tragic
12.2%
Males
Tragic
15.4%
Tragic
12.8%
Females
Tragic
15.4%
Exceptional
11.6%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.9%
Tragic
4.5%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.9%
Exceptional
4.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
9.0%
Fair
6.7%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
16.4%
Tragic
16.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
30.2%
Tragic
37.8%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
52.7%
Tragic
61.1%
Vision
Tragic
3.3%
Tragic
2.7%
Hearing
Tragic
4.5%
Tragic
5.8%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.4%
Exceptional
16.9%
Ambulatory
Tragic
8.3%
Exceptional
5.2%
Self-Care
Tragic
3.0%
Exceptional
1.9%