Luxembourger vs Yaqui Community Comparison

COMPARE

Luxembourger
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Yaqui
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Luxembourgers

Yaqui

Excellent
Poor
9,215
SOCIAL INDEX
89.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
27th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,558
SOCIAL INDEX
13.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
299th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Yaqui Integration in Luxembourger Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,860,789 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Yaqui within Luxembourger communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.780. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Luxembourgers within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.932% in Yaqui. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Luxembourgers corresponds to an increase of 932.3 Yaqui.
Luxembourger Integration in Yaqui Communities

Luxembourger vs Yaqui Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Yaqui communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($45,663 compared to $36,112, a difference of 26.5%), median family income ($106,183 compared to $87,289, a difference of 21.6%), and median male earnings ($56,300 compared to $46,777, a difference of 20.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,379 compared to $48,300, a difference of 4.3%), householder income over 65 years ($60,967 compared to $56,417, a difference of 8.1%), and wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 24.0%, a difference of 14.1%).
Luxembourger vs Yaqui Income
Income MetricLuxembourgerYaqui
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$45,663
Tragic
$36,112
Median Family Income
Excellent
$106,183
Tragic
$87,289
Median Household Income
Good
$86,418
Tragic
$74,596
Median Earnings
Excellent
$47,640
Tragic
$40,647
Median Male Earnings
Excellent
$56,300
Tragic
$46,777
Median Female Earnings
Average
$39,891
Tragic
$34,943
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$50,379
Tragic
$48,300
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Excellent
$97,237
Tragic
$81,656
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Excellent
$103,536
Tragic
$86,914
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Average
$60,967
Tragic
$56,417
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.4%
Exceptional
24.0%

Luxembourger vs Yaqui Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Yaqui communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (3.9% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 63.0%), family poverty (7.2% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 57.1%), and receiving food stamps (9.1% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 52.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.9% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 4.8%), single male poverty (13.4% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 6.7%), and single father poverty (17.1% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 9.8%).
Luxembourger vs Yaqui Poverty
Poverty MetricLuxembourgerYaqui
Poverty
Exceptional
10.6%
Tragic
15.1%
Families
Exceptional
7.2%
Tragic
11.3%
Males
Exceptional
9.5%
Tragic
13.7%
Females
Exceptional
11.6%
Tragic
16.4%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
20.9%
Tragic
21.9%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.1%
Tragic
17.0%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
14.9%
Tragic
21.7%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.6%
Tragic
20.4%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.8%
Tragic
20.7%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.3%
Tragic
20.3%
Single Males
Tragic
13.4%
Tragic
14.2%
Single Females
Excellent
20.4%
Tragic
24.9%
Single Fathers
Tragic
17.1%
Exceptional
15.6%
Single Mothers
Excellent
28.5%
Tragic
33.1%
Married Couples
Exceptional
3.9%
Tragic
6.3%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.2%
Tragic
11.9%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
10.8%
Fair
12.5%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.1%
Tragic
13.9%

Luxembourger vs Yaqui Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Yaqui communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (4.4% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 36.8%), unemployment (4.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 33.2%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.0% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 32.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.3% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 5.2%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 8.9%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.1% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 9.0%).
Luxembourger vs Yaqui Unemployment
Unemployment MetricLuxembourgerYaqui
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
5.8%
Males
Exceptional
4.5%
Tragic
5.7%
Females
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
6.0%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.0%
Tragic
11.9%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
15.1%
Tragic
19.0%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.1%
Exceptional
9.9%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Tragic
7.1%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
5.9%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
5.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Tragic
4.7%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Tragic
5.2%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Excellent
4.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
5.7%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
5.5%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.7%
Tragic
9.4%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.6%
Tragic
8.6%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.3%
Exceptional
8.7%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
6.6%

Luxembourger vs Yaqui Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Yaqui communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (45.3% compared to 37.1%, a difference of 22.2%), in labor force | age 45-54 (85.0% compared to 78.9%, a difference of 7.8%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (86.4% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 7.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (79.0% compared to 75.5%, a difference of 4.5%), in labor force | age 25-29 (86.9% compared to 82.2%, a difference of 5.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.7% compared to 63.0%, a difference of 5.8%).
Luxembourger vs Yaqui Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricLuxembourgerYaqui
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.7%
Tragic
63.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
81.9%
Tragic
76.5%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
45.3%
Good
37.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
79.0%
Excellent
75.5%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
86.9%
Tragic
82.2%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
86.6%
Tragic
81.4%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
86.4%
Tragic
80.5%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
85.0%
Tragic
78.9%

Luxembourger vs Yaqui Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Yaqui communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 43.0%), single mother households (5.6% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 33.8%), and births to unmarried women (29.4% compared to 38.8%, a difference of 31.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.3% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 3.7%), average family size (3.10 compared to 3.32, a difference of 7.2%), and family households with children (27.0% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 7.8%).
Luxembourger vs Yaqui Family Structure
Family Structure MetricLuxembourgerYaqui
Family Households
Tragic
63.3%
Exceptional
65.6%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
27.0%
Exceptional
29.1%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
48.5%
Tragic
44.5%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.10
Exceptional
3.32
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Tragic
3.2%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.6%
Tragic
7.4%
Currently Married
Exceptional
49.3%
Tragic
43.4%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.3%
Tragic
13.3%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
29.4%
Tragic
38.8%

Luxembourger vs Yaqui Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Yaqui communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 39.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 22.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.9% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (59.1% compared to 59.3%, a difference of 0.40%), 1 or more vehicles in household (94.8% compared to 92.6%, a difference of 2.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.9% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 9.7%).
Luxembourger vs Yaqui Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricLuxembourgerYaqui
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
5.4%
Exceptional
7.5%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
94.8%
Exceptional
92.6%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.1%
Exceptional
59.3%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
20.9%
Exceptional
22.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
6.6%
Exceptional
8.1%

Luxembourger vs Yaqui Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Yaqui communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 53.0%), professional degree (4.6% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 46.3%), and master's degree (15.3% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 39.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.92%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.93%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.96%).
Luxembourger vs Yaqui Education Level
Education Level MetricLuxembourgerYaqui
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.6%
Tragic
2.4%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.5%
Tragic
97.6%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.5%
Tragic
97.6%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Tragic
97.5%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
97.5%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
97.3%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
96.9%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Tragic
96.7%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Tragic
96.3%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.2%
Tragic
94.6%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.0%
Tragic
94.2%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.3%
Tragic
92.9%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.4%
Tragic
91.1%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.5%
Tragic
89.5%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
93.3%
Tragic
87.5%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.7%
Tragic
84.7%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.6%
Tragic
80.5%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
68.2%
Tragic
60.2%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
62.1%
Tragic
53.2%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
48.9%
Tragic
37.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Excellent
39.8%
Tragic
29.0%
Master's Degree
Good
15.3%
Tragic
11.0%
Professional Degree
Good
4.6%
Tragic
3.2%
Doctorate Degree
Excellent
1.9%
Tragic
1.5%

Luxembourger vs Yaqui Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Yaqui communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (1.9% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 28.8%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.4% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 27.9%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.6% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 27.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (3.2% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 6.3%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.9% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 8.5%), and disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 8.9%).
Luxembourger vs Yaqui Disability
Disability MetricLuxembourgerYaqui
Disability
Exceptional
11.3%
Tragic
13.1%
Males
Good
11.1%
Tragic
12.9%
Females
Exceptional
11.6%
Tragic
13.2%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.3%
Good
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.3%
Tragic
6.2%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
6.9%
Tragic
7.4%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.6%
Tragic
13.5%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.4%
Tragic
27.4%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
44.8%
Tragic
49.8%
Vision
Exceptional
1.9%
Tragic
2.5%
Hearing
Tragic
3.2%
Tragic
3.4%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.4%
Tragic
18.5%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.6%
Tragic
6.8%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.2%
Tragic
2.7%