Pima vs West Indian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 47,552,922 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of West Indians within Pima communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.365. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pima within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.013% in West Indians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pima corresponds to an increase of 12.7 West Indians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Pima and West Indian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($30,644 compared to $41,217, a difference of 34.5%), median household income ($63,262 compared to $78,455, a difference of 24.0%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($73,365 compared to $89,906, a difference of 22.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,503 compared to $51,583, a difference of 0.15%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,821 compared to $87,205, a difference of 5.3%), and wage/income gap (21.1% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 7.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pima and West Indian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (11.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 78.8%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (25.3% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 66.7%), and family poverty (18.4% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 59.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (19.0% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 16.7%), single father poverty (14.8% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 22.2%), and single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 30.8%, a difference of 25.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pima and West Indian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (11.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 108.1%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (18.9% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 98.2%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (11.7% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 85.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (23.1% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 3.2%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 4.9%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 10.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pima and West Indian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (69.0% compared to 78.3%, a difference of 13.5%), in labor force | age 25-29 (74.3% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 12.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (57.4% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 12.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (69.0% compared to 71.3%, a difference of 3.3%), in labor force | age 30-34 (79.0% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 6.4%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 31.3%, a difference of 8.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pima and West Indian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (4.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 88.2%), births to unmarried women (51.5% compared to 37.3%, a difference of 38.1%), and currently married (35.9% compared to 41.3%, a difference of 15.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.1% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 3.1%), divorced or separated (12.9% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 4.1%), and family households (65.9% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pima and West Indian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 86.3%), no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 23.7%, a difference of 67.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 60.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.3% compared to 76.4%, a difference of 13.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 41.3%, a difference of 26.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 60.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pima and West Indian communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (9.2% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 56.3%), bachelor's degree (23.2% compared to 35.8%, a difference of 54.2%), and associate's degree (30.2% compared to 43.8%, a difference of 45.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (93.9% compared to 93.7%, a difference of 0.20%), nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.71%), and kindergarten (98.2% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.74%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pima and West Indian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (38.6% compared to 24.5%, a difference of 57.8%), hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 40.9%), and vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 40.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 0.77%), cognitive disability (18.8% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 3.9%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.2% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 5.4%).