Immigrants from Latin America vs Tlingit-Haida Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 57,553,529 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Tlingit-Haida within Immigrant from Latin America communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.299. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Latin America within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.002% in Tlingit-Haida. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Latin America corresponds to a decrease of 1.6 Tlingit-Haida.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latin America and Tlingit-Haida communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($36,823 compared to $43,516, a difference of 18.2%), householder income over 65 years ($53,265 compared to $62,922, a difference of 18.1%), and median family income ($86,989 compared to $101,092, a difference of 16.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (23.7% compared to 24.0%, a difference of 0.96%), householder income under 25 years ($51,387 compared to $55,914, a difference of 8.8%), and median earnings ($41,049 compared to $45,468, a difference of 10.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latin America and Tlingit-Haida communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.2% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 69.6%), married-couple family poverty (7.2% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 64.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.6% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 61.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (32.4% compared to 30.9%, a difference of 4.9%), single father poverty (16.4% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 6.8%), and single female poverty (23.7% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 8.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latin America and Tlingit-Haida communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.0% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 131.3%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.6% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 36.0%), and female unemployment (6.1% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 23.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.6% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 0.21%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.1% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 1.9%), and male unemployment (5.9% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latin America and Tlingit-Haida communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.9% compared to 40.5%, a difference of 19.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.1% compared to 77.9%, a difference of 5.2%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.0% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (82.8% compared to 82.5%, a difference of 0.36%), in labor force | age 20-64 (78.3% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 0.95%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.1% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 0.98%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latin America and Tlingit-Haida communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.9% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 37.7%), births to unmarried women (37.1% compared to 32.2%, a difference of 15.3%), and family households with children (29.7% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 14.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (44.7% compared to 45.1%, a difference of 1.1%), single father households (2.8% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 4.4%), and divorced or separated (12.4% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 6.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latin America and Tlingit-Haida communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.1% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 4.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.5% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 3.4%), and no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.8% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 0.25%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.3% compared to 55.8%, a difference of 2.7%), and no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latin America and Tlingit-Haida communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.3% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 126.5%), doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 30.7%), and professional degree (3.3% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 21.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.7% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 2.1%), kindergarten (96.7% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 2.1%), and 1st grade (96.7% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latin America and Tlingit-Haida communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 70.7%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 26.3%), and male disability (11.2% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 23.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 1.9%), disability age over 75 (49.5% compared to 50.6%, a difference of 2.1%), and ambulatory disability (6.3% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 2.7%).