Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Sudanese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 75,297,523 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Sudanese within Immigrant from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.669. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Czechoslovakia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.668% in Sudanese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Czechoslovakia corresponds to an increase of 667.8 Sudanese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Sudanese communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($106,888 compared to $84,401, a difference of 26.6%), per capita income ($51,770 compared to $41,695, a difference of 24.2%), and median male earnings ($62,217 compared to $51,216, a difference of 21.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.3% compared to 24.0%, a difference of 13.8%), householder income over 65 years ($66,376 compared to $58,281, a difference of 13.9%), and median female earnings ($43,571 compared to $38,215, a difference of 14.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Sudanese communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 16 (13.9% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 33.0%), child poverty among girls under 16 (14.2% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 31.4%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (14.8% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 30.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 0.57%), single father poverty (16.2% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 2.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.0% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 7.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Sudanese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 22.8%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 21.9%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 15.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.73%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 1.8%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.4% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Sudanese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.6% compared to 42.9%, a difference of 17.2%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 68.0%, a difference of 5.1%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.0% compared to 78.4%, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.19%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.24%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 0.43%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Sudanese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.3% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 29.7%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 19.0%), and births to unmarried women (28.4% compared to 32.4%, a difference of 14.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.14 compared to 3.20, a difference of 1.9%), family households with children (26.2% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 4.4%), and family households (63.4% compared to 60.0%, a difference of 5.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Sudanese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.8% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 19.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.5% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 3.5%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (54.1% compared to 53.6%, a difference of 0.91%), 1 or more vehicles in household (88.3% compared to 90.3%, a difference of 2.2%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Sudanese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 26.9%), professional degree (5.8% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 25.4%), and master's degree (18.5% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 21.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2nd grade (98.1% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.49%), nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.51%), and kindergarten (98.2% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.51%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Sudanese communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.0% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 19.6%), cognitive disability (16.2% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 16.4%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.0% compared to 23.7%, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (10.9% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 1.2%), ambulatory disability (5.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 2.0%), and disability (11.2% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 2.8%).