Luxembourger vs Subsaharan African Community Comparison

COMPARE

Luxembourger
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Subsaharan African
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Luxembourgers

Sub-Saharan Africans

Excellent
Tragic
9,215
SOCIAL INDEX
89.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
27th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
977
SOCIAL INDEX
7.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
330th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Subsaharan African Integration in Luxembourger Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 140,112,441 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Sub-Saharan Africans within Luxembourger communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.037. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Luxembourgers within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.027% in Sub-Saharan Africans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Luxembourgers corresponds to a decrease of 26.8 Sub-Saharan Africans.
Luxembourger Integration in Subsaharan African Communities

Luxembourger vs Subsaharan African Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 20.2%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($97,237 compared to $84,235, a difference of 15.4%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,536 compared to $90,691, a difference of 14.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,379 compared to $48,691, a difference of 3.5%), median female earnings ($39,891 compared to $38,391, a difference of 3.9%), and householder income over 65 years ($60,967 compared to $56,615, a difference of 7.7%).
Luxembourger vs Subsaharan African Income
Income MetricLuxembourgerSubsaharan African
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$45,663
Tragic
$40,152
Median Family Income
Excellent
$106,183
Tragic
$93,748
Median Household Income
Good
$86,418
Tragic
$77,631
Median Earnings
Excellent
$47,640
Tragic
$44,118
Median Male Earnings
Excellent
$56,300
Tragic
$50,408
Median Female Earnings
Average
$39,891
Tragic
$38,391
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$50,379
Tragic
$48,691
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Excellent
$97,237
Tragic
$84,235
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Excellent
$103,536
Tragic
$90,691
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Average
$60,967
Tragic
$56,615
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.4%
Exceptional
22.8%

Luxembourger vs Subsaharan African Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.1% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 54.2%), family poverty (7.2% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 50.3%), and married-couple family poverty (3.9% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 46.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (17.1% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 1.0%), single male poverty (13.4% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 2.6%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.9% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 5.5%).
Luxembourger vs Subsaharan African Poverty
Poverty MetricLuxembourgerSubsaharan African
Poverty
Exceptional
10.6%
Tragic
14.5%
Families
Exceptional
7.2%
Tragic
10.9%
Males
Exceptional
9.5%
Tragic
13.3%
Females
Exceptional
11.6%
Tragic
15.8%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
20.9%
Tragic
22.0%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.1%
Tragic
15.6%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
14.9%
Tragic
20.8%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.6%
Tragic
19.9%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.8%
Tragic
20.0%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.3%
Tragic
20.1%
Single Males
Tragic
13.4%
Tragic
13.7%
Single Females
Excellent
20.4%
Tragic
23.2%
Single Fathers
Tragic
17.1%
Tragic
16.9%
Single Mothers
Excellent
28.5%
Tragic
31.4%
Married Couples
Exceptional
3.9%
Tragic
5.7%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.2%
Tragic
12.1%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
10.8%
Tragic
13.2%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.1%
Tragic
14.1%

Luxembourger vs Subsaharan African Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in unemployment (4.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 33.5%), male unemployment (4.5% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 31.4%), and female unemployment (4.4% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 29.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 4.7%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 7.5%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.5% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 10.2%).
Luxembourger vs Subsaharan African Unemployment
Unemployment MetricLuxembourgerSubsaharan African
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
5.8%
Males
Exceptional
4.5%
Tragic
6.0%
Females
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
5.7%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.0%
Tragic
12.6%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
15.1%
Tragic
18.7%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.1%
Tragic
11.1%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Tragic
7.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
6.0%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
5.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Tragic
4.9%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Fair
4.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Poor
5.4%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.8%
Poor
5.2%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.7%
Tragic
9.2%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.6%
Tragic
8.4%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.3%
Tragic
10.0%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
6.2%

Luxembourger vs Subsaharan African Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (45.3% compared to 38.4%, a difference of 17.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (79.0% compared to 75.7%, a difference of 4.3%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (85.0% compared to 82.0%, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (66.7% compared to 66.2%, a difference of 0.79%), in labor force | age 30-34 (86.6% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (86.4% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 2.8%).
Luxembourger vs Subsaharan African Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricLuxembourgerSubsaharan African
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.7%
Exceptional
66.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
81.9%
Poor
79.3%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
45.3%
Exceptional
38.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
79.0%
Exceptional
75.7%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
86.9%
Poor
84.3%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
86.6%
Poor
84.5%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
86.4%
Tragic
84.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
85.0%
Tragic
82.0%

Luxembourger vs Subsaharan African Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.6% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 40.4%), births to unmarried women (29.4% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 24.6%), and married-couple households (48.5% compared to 41.6%, a difference of 16.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.3% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 2.0%), family households with children (27.0% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 2.0%), and average family size (3.10 compared to 3.25, a difference of 4.8%).
Luxembourger vs Subsaharan African Family Structure
Family Structure MetricLuxembourgerSubsaharan African
Family Households
Tragic
63.3%
Tragic
62.1%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
27.0%
Good
27.6%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
48.5%
Tragic
41.6%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.10
Excellent
3.25
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Tragic
2.4%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.6%
Tragic
7.8%
Currently Married
Exceptional
49.3%
Tragic
42.6%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.3%
Tragic
12.7%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
29.4%
Tragic
36.7%

Luxembourger vs Subsaharan African Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 127.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.9% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 16.9%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 16.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (94.8% compared to 87.9%, a difference of 7.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.1% compared to 51.9%, a difference of 13.8%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 16.0%).
Luxembourger vs Subsaharan African Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricLuxembourgerSubsaharan African
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
5.4%
Tragic
12.2%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
94.8%
Tragic
87.9%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.1%
Tragic
51.9%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
20.9%
Tragic
17.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
6.6%
Tragic
5.7%

Luxembourger vs Subsaharan African Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 44.9%), professional degree (4.6% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 12.6%), and associate's degree (48.9% compared to 43.9%, a difference of 11.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.80%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.81%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.81%).
Luxembourger vs Subsaharan African Education Level
Education Level MetricLuxembourgerSubsaharan African
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.6%
Tragic
2.3%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.5%
Tragic
97.7%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.5%
Tragic
97.7%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Tragic
97.7%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
97.6%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
97.5%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
97.2%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Tragic
97.0%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Tragic
96.7%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.2%
Tragic
95.7%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.0%
Tragic
95.3%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.3%
Tragic
94.4%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.4%
Tragic
93.1%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.5%
Tragic
91.7%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
93.3%
Tragic
90.1%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.7%
Tragic
87.9%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.6%
Tragic
84.2%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
68.2%
Tragic
63.2%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
62.1%
Tragic
57.3%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
48.9%
Tragic
43.9%
Bachelor's Degree
Excellent
39.8%
Tragic
35.8%
Master's Degree
Good
15.3%
Poor
14.2%
Professional Degree
Good
4.6%
Poor
4.1%
Doctorate Degree
Excellent
1.9%
Fair
1.8%

Luxembourger vs Subsaharan African Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (1.9% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 21.1%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.6% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 19.5%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.4% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 17.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 0.73%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.9% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 3.0%), and male disability (11.1% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 5.6%).
Luxembourger vs Subsaharan African Disability
Disability MetricLuxembourgerSubsaharan African
Disability
Exceptional
11.3%
Tragic
12.3%
Males
Good
11.1%
Tragic
11.8%
Females
Exceptional
11.6%
Tragic
12.7%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.3%
Tragic
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.3%
Tragic
6.2%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
6.9%
Tragic
7.1%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.6%
Tragic
12.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.4%
Tragic
25.1%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
44.8%
Tragic
48.2%
Vision
Exceptional
1.9%
Tragic
2.3%
Hearing
Tragic
3.2%
Excellent
2.9%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.4%
Tragic
18.5%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.6%
Tragic
6.4%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.2%
Tragic
2.6%