Immigrants from Central America vs Puerto Rican Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 501,851,713 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Puerto Ricans within Immigrant from Central America communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.459. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Central America within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.028% in Puerto Ricans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Central America corresponds to a decrease of 28.1 Puerto Ricans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Puerto Rican communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (24.6% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 31.7%), householder income under 25 years ($51,022 compared to $39,726, a difference of 28.4%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,420 compared to $42,550, a difference of 25.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($33,953 compared to $31,560, a difference of 7.6%), median earnings ($39,762 compared to $35,560, a difference of 11.8%), and per capita income ($34,974 compared to $31,268, a difference of 11.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Puerto Rican communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (16.0% compared to 31.5%, a difference of 96.9%), single male poverty (13.8% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 82.4%), and receiving food stamps (15.0% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 73.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (33.6% compared to 44.5%, a difference of 32.7%), single female poverty (24.8% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 37.4%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.2% compared to 29.8%, a difference of 47.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Puerto Rican communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.7% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 56.0%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.5% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 48.7%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.4% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 48.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.1% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 3.5%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.7% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 4.1%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.9% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 7.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Puerto Rican communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.0% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 15.2%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 58.1%, a difference of 11.4%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.0% compared to 68.3%, a difference of 9.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (82.5% compared to 81.2%, a difference of 1.5%), in labor force | age 35-44 (82.0% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.4% compared to 80.4%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Puerto Rican communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (37.4% compared to 45.7%, a difference of 22.0%), family households with children (31.0% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 21.0%), and single father households (3.0% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 15.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (68.3% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 6.5%), average family size (3.49 compared to 3.28, a difference of 6.6%), and single mother households (8.1% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 8.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Puerto Rican communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.5% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 79.6%), no vehicles in household (8.9% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 73.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.4% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 50.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.1% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 7.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.6% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 24.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.4% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 50.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Puerto Rican communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 55.4%), doctorate degree (1.2% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 18.0%), and associate's degree (35.0% compared to 40.4%, a difference of 15.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.4% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 1.3%), kindergarten (96.4% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 1.3%), and 2nd grade (96.2% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Puerto Rican communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.5% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 57.3%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.6% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 47.9%), and ambulatory disability (6.2% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 42.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (50.5% compared to 52.9%, a difference of 4.6%), cognitive disability (17.7% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 8.3%), and disability age 65 to 74 (26.6% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 9.4%).