Choctaw vs Peruvian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 207,945,869 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Peruvians within Choctaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.624. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Choctaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.019% in Peruvians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Choctaw corresponds to an increase of 19.2 Peruvians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Peruvian communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($69,947 compared to $90,261, a difference of 29.0%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,287 compared to $105,070, a difference of 27.7%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($78,168 compared to $98,886, a difference of 26.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.1% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 9.9%), median male earnings ($47,729 compared to $55,659, a difference of 16.6%), and median earnings ($40,270 compared to $47,628, a difference of 18.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Peruvian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (23.5% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 46.8%), single male poverty (17.0% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 44.2%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (18.1% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 42.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.4% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 2.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.5% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 6.7%), and receiving food stamps (13.6% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 15.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Peruvian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.8% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 30.1%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 17.7%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.3% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 13.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.40%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.6% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 1.5%), and unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Peruvian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 34.6%, a difference of 9.8%), in labor force | age > 16 (61.5% compared to 66.3%, a difference of 7.9%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (78.2% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 6.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.7% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 0.21%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.4% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 4.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (81.0% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 4.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Peruvian communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (14.1% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 18.6%), births to unmarried women (36.9% compared to 31.5%, a difference of 17.1%), and single father households (2.7% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 14.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (46.3% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 0.82%), average family size (3.21 compared to 3.30, a difference of 2.6%), and family households with children (28.1% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Peruvian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 42.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 20.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 17.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.2% compared to 88.8%, a difference of 3.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.3% compared to 55.0%, a difference of 7.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 17.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Peruvian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.2% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 39.6%), master's degree (11.0% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 38.7%), and no schooling completed (1.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 31.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of high school diploma (87.8% compared to 87.8%, a difference of 0.010%), 11th grade (91.8% compared to 91.5%, a difference of 0.34%), and 12th grade, no diploma (89.8% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 0.42%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Peruvian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.5% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 66.6%), disability age 35 to 64 (16.4% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 66.5%), and vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 58.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.4% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 10.6%), disability age over 75 (52.7% compared to 46.8%, a difference of 12.4%), and self-care disability (3.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 26.2%).