Czechoslovakian vs Ottawa Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,620,370 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Ottawa within Czechoslovakian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.154. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Czechoslovakians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.058% in Ottawa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Czechoslovakians corresponds to an increase of 58.3 Ottawa.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Ottawa communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($101,387 compared to $83,953, a difference of 20.8%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($95,070 compared to $79,012, a difference of 20.3%), and median household income ($84,965 compared to $70,984, a difference of 19.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.2% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 4.5%), householder income under 25 years ($51,224 compared to $47,366, a difference of 8.1%), and householder income over 65 years ($60,581 compared to $53,217, a difference of 13.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Ottawa communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among boys under 16 (15.3% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 27.5%), child poverty under the age of 16 (15.1% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 27.4%), and receiving food stamps (10.3% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 27.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.9% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 4.3%), single father poverty (17.1% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 8.8%), and single male poverty (13.4% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 9.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Ottawa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 28.1%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 22.3%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 20.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.0% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 0.34%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 1.8%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.5% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Ottawa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (83.0% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 4.4%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.3% compared to 62.0%, a difference of 3.8%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.5% compared to 76.7%, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (77.5% compared to 76.8%, a difference of 0.87%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 2.4%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Ottawa communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.3% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 14.6%), births to unmarried women (32.0% compared to 36.5%, a difference of 13.8%), and single mother households (5.9% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 10.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.13 compared to 3.11, a difference of 0.59%), family households (64.6% compared to 63.0%, a difference of 2.6%), and family households with children (27.0% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Ottawa communities in the United States are seen in 3 or more vehicles in household (21.7% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 7.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.1% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 7.3%), and no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 6.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 92.7%, a difference of 0.42%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.8% compared to 57.9%, a difference of 3.4%), and no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 6.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Ottawa communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.2% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 22.7%), master's degree (14.5% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 22.3%), and bachelor's degree (37.0% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 19.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.0%), 1st grade (98.4% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.0%), and 2nd grade (98.4% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.0%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Ottawa communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (11.8% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 24.0%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.4% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 15.3%), and male disability (12.3% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 14.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.6% compared to 47.6%, a difference of 2.2%), hearing disability (3.6% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 7.8%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 9.0%).