Bhutanese vs Irish Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 455,437,288 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Irish within Bhutanese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.565. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Bhutanese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.113% in Irish. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Bhutanese corresponds to a decrease of 112.9 Irish.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Irish communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($72,288 compared to $61,097, a difference of 18.3%), median household income ($100,151 compared to $86,145, a difference of 16.3%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($117,750 compared to $103,067, a difference of 14.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.0% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 5.5%), median male earnings ($61,759 compared to $56,464, a difference of 9.4%), and median earnings ($52,297 compared to $47,276, a difference of 10.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Irish communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (11.1% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 26.2%), child poverty under the age of 5 (13.4% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 25.9%), and single female poverty (17.7% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 21.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.3% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 0.62%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.6% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 1.0%), and married-couple family poverty (4.1% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Irish communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.0% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 27.1%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.7% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 20.7%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.1% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 18.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (4.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.16%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 0.62%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.4% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 0.70%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Irish communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.3% compared to 42.0%, a difference of 15.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.4% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.21%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.33%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.33%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Irish communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (27.9% compared to 32.2%, a difference of 15.6%), divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 11.9%), and single mother households (5.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 10.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (48.6% compared to 48.9%, a difference of 0.49%), married-couple households (49.3% compared to 48.6%, a difference of 1.3%), and family households with children (27.3% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Irish communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 17.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 10.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (59.1% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 1.7%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 93.1%, a difference of 1.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Irish communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.8% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 25.3%), professional degree (5.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 23.4%), and doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 23.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (93.0% compared to 93.0%, a difference of 0.040%), high school diploma (91.2% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 0.20%), and nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.40%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Irish communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 45.0%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.9% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 27.1%), and disability age 35 to 64 (9.8% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 25.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.1% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 1.3%), cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 1.4%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 4.6%).