Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Indonesian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 102,870,831 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Indonesians within Immigrant from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.325. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Czechoslovakia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.159% in Indonesians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Czechoslovakia corresponds to an increase of 159.0 Indonesians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Indonesian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($51,770 compared to $37,300, a difference of 38.8%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($106,888 compared to $79,543, a difference of 34.4%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($111,914 compared to $84,890, a difference of 31.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,352 compared to $45,566, a difference of 19.3%), wage/income gap (27.3% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 20.0%), and median female earnings ($43,571 compared to $36,140, a difference of 20.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Indonesian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 16 (13.9% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 50.7%), child poverty under the age of 5 (14.8% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 50.6%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (14.2% compared to 21.3%, a difference of 50.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 2.9%), single father poverty (16.2% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 7.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.0% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 14.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Indonesian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 21.9%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 15.9%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.3% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 15.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.040%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 1.3%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Indonesian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.6% compared to 40.7%, a difference of 11.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.0% compared to 77.2%, a difference of 3.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 66.3%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.9% compared to 79.4%, a difference of 0.64%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.4% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.86%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Indonesian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.3% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 40.6%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 26.1%), and births to unmarried women (28.4% compared to 35.0%, a difference of 23.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.4% compared to 61.5%, a difference of 3.2%), average family size (3.14 compared to 3.28, a difference of 4.3%), and family households with children (26.2% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 7.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Indonesian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.8% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 14.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 3.0%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (88.3% compared to 89.7%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (18.5% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 1.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.1% compared to 53.4%, a difference of 1.4%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (88.3% compared to 89.7%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Indonesian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.8% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 76.2%), professional degree (5.8% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 58.6%), and doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 47.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2nd grade (98.1% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 1.4%), nursery school (98.2% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 1.5%), and kindergarten (98.2% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Indonesian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.0% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 32.7%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.0% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 18.5%), and cognitive disability (16.2% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 15.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 3.8%), hearing disability (3.1% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 3.9%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 5.1%).