Bhutanese vs Immigrants Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 455,288,192 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants within Bhutanese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.151. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Bhutanese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.103% in Immigrants. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Bhutanese corresponds to a decrease of 102.7 Immigrants.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Immigrants communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($72,288 compared to $59,656, a difference of 21.2%), median family income ($119,800 compared to $100,962, a difference of 18.7%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($117,750 compared to $99,943, a difference of 17.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($57,078 compared to $53,201, a difference of 7.3%), wage/income gap (27.0% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 7.4%), and median female earnings ($43,648 compared to $39,328, a difference of 11.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Immigrants communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.1% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 47.2%), family poverty (7.0% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 41.5%), and receiving food stamps (9.2% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 41.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.0% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 5.9%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.2% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 6.2%), and single male poverty (11.1% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 14.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Immigrants communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.0% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 16.8%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.7% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 16.4%), and female unemployment (4.9% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 15.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 6.7%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.6% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 8.5%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 8.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Immigrants communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.3% compared to 34.6%, a difference of 5.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.4% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.5% compared to 82.1%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 0.090%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 1.0%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Immigrants communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.3% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 29.7%), births to unmarried women (27.9% compared to 32.7%, a difference of 17.2%), and single father households (2.1% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 16.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.9% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 0.44%), average family size (3.25 compared to 3.33, a difference of 2.5%), and divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 5.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Immigrants communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 33.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 15.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 11.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 1.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.1% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 7.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 11.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Immigrants communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.8% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 54.9%), doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 27.0%), and professional degree (5.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 24.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 1.0%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 1.0%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Immigrants communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.2% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 13.0%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 12.5%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.5% compared to 23.7%, a difference of 10.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (11.2% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 0.37%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 0.85%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 1.2%).