Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Immigrants from Yemen Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 63,745,234 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Yemen within Trinidadian and Tobagonian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.402. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Trinidadians and Tobagonians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.026% in Immigrants from Yemen. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Trinidadians and Tobagonians corresponds to an increase of 26.0 Immigrants from Yemen.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Trinidadian and Tobagonian and Immigrants from Yemen communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($41,655 compared to $33,696, a difference of 23.6%), median household income ($80,402 compared to $65,194, a difference of 23.3%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($89,856 compared to $73,043, a difference of 23.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (19.3% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 8.9%), median earnings ($45,820 compared to $39,540, a difference of 15.9%), and householder income over 65 years ($55,327 compared to $47,527, a difference of 16.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Trinidadian and Tobagonian and Immigrants from Yemen communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (6.2% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 105.4%), family poverty (10.9% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 59.6%), and male poverty (13.1% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 53.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.9% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 3.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.2% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 11.9%), and single father poverty (17.0% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 20.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Trinidadian and Tobagonian and Immigrants from Yemen communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.3% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 99.4%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.0% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 68.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 53.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.8% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 2.6%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (14.6% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 6.6%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.5% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 11.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Trinidadian and Tobagonian and Immigrants from Yemen communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 35-44 (84.5% compared to 76.3%, a difference of 10.7%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.9% compared to 74.4%, a difference of 10.1%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.0% compared to 72.3%, a difference of 9.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (30.9% compared to 31.5%, a difference of 1.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.5% compared to 68.9%, a difference of 3.8%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.9% compared to 78.2%, a difference of 7.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Trinidadian and Tobagonian and Immigrants from Yemen communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (36.5% compared to 31.7%, a difference of 15.2%), family households with children (26.4% compared to 29.4%, a difference of 11.5%), and average family size (3.32 compared to 3.60, a difference of 8.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 0.28%), family households (63.6% compared to 63.0%, a difference of 1.0%), and currently married (41.5% compared to 42.1%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Trinidadian and Tobagonian and Immigrants from Yemen communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (23.7% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 22.0%), 1 or more vehicles in household (76.3% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 5.5%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (40.9% compared to 42.8%, a difference of 4.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (13.6% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 4.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.3% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 4.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (40.9% compared to 42.8%, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Trinidadian and Tobagonian and Immigrants from Yemen communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.6% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 58.8%), master's degree (14.4% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 24.2%), and bachelor's degree (35.7% compared to 29.9%, a difference of 19.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (97.4% compared to 95.9%, a difference of 1.6%), nursery school (97.4% compared to 95.9%, a difference of 1.6%), and 1st grade (97.3% compared to 95.8%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Trinidadian and Tobagonian and Immigrants from Yemen communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (11.4% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 23.6%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 0.91%, a difference of 23.5%), and vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 16.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.9% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 5.2%), female disability (12.3% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 7.0%), and ambulatory disability (6.6% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 7.6%).