U.S. Virgin Islander vs Immigrants from Thailand Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 73,631,508 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Thailand within U.S. Virgin Islander communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.032. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in U.S. Virgin Islanders within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.010% in Immigrants from Thailand. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 U.S. Virgin Islanders corresponds to a decrease of 9.9 Immigrants from Thailand.

When considering income, the most significant differences between U.S. Virgin Islander and Immigrants from Thailand communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,736 compared to $97,400, a difference of 17.7%), median family income ($85,294 compared to $99,840, a difference of 17.1%), and median household income ($71,853 compared to $83,327, a difference of 16.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($36,424 compared to $38,810, a difference of 6.6%), householder income under 25 years ($47,448 compared to $50,645, a difference of 6.7%), and median earnings ($41,448 compared to $45,598, a difference of 10.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between U.S. Virgin Islander and Immigrants from Thailand communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (16.5% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 33.5%), family poverty (12.4% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 28.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.0% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 27.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.5% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 7.4%), single mother poverty (32.6% compared to 29.9%, a difference of 9.1%), and single female poverty (24.2% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 10.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between U.S. Virgin Islander and Immigrants from Thailand communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (21.3% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 25.3%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.7% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 23.2%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (8.1% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 23.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.1% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 7.7%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.1% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 9.0%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (5.0% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 9.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between U.S. Virgin Islander and Immigrants from Thailand communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.6% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 15.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.0% compared to 76.4%, a difference of 4.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.0% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 0.050%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.1% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.48%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.2% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 0.91%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between U.S. Virgin Islander and Immigrants from Thailand communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.6% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 25.6%), births to unmarried women (39.6% compared to 32.8%, a difference of 20.8%), and married-couple households (39.8% compared to 45.2%, a difference of 13.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.29 compared to 3.27, a difference of 0.79%), family households (62.6% compared to 63.8%, a difference of 1.9%), and family households with children (27.1% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between U.S. Virgin Islander and Immigrants from Thailand communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.4% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 61.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.6% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 48.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (15.4% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 33.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (84.6% compared to 90.6%, a difference of 7.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (47.5% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 19.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (15.4% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 33.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between U.S. Virgin Islander and Immigrants from Thailand communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 24.2%), professional degree (3.7% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 16.9%), and no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 16.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (94.0% compared to 93.9%, a difference of 0.080%), 10th grade (92.7% compared to 92.8%, a difference of 0.090%), and 6th grade (96.5% compared to 96.3%, a difference of 0.22%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between U.S. Virgin Islander and Immigrants from Thailand communities in the United States are seen in ambulatory disability (6.8% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 11.2%), vision disability (2.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 10.8%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.3% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 10.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.9% compared to 48.3%, a difference of 1.4%), male disability (11.9% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 2.6%), and disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 3.4%).