Immigrants from Oceania vs Immigrants from Switzerland Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 126,359,772 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Switzerland within Immigrant from Oceania communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.119. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Oceania within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.000% in Immigrants from Switzerland. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Oceania corresponds to a decrease of 0.3 Immigrants from Switzerland.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Switzerland communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($45,220 compared to $54,866, a difference of 21.3%), median male earnings ($55,712 compared to $63,944, a difference of 14.8%), and median family income ($106,453 compared to $120,726, a difference of 13.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,680 compared to $53,528, a difference of 0.28%), householder income over 65 years ($64,416 compared to $69,343, a difference of 7.6%), and wage/income gap (25.6% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 8.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Switzerland communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (11.4% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 17.3%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.7% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 10.5%), and married-couple family poverty (5.0% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 9.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (28.7% compared to 28.3%, a difference of 1.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.4% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 1.9%), and single female poverty (20.7% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Switzerland communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.0% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 24.8%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.5% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 10.3%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.1% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 0.18%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.48%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.4% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 0.50%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Switzerland communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.9% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 6.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 74.2%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.0% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.3% compared to 79.6%, a difference of 0.32%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 0.68%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.9% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.69%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Switzerland communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.5% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 21.9%), single mother households (6.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 18.3%), and family households with children (28.1% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 9.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (46.5% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 0.88%), married-couple households (46.9% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 1.5%), and divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Switzerland communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 29.4%), no vehicles in household (9.7% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 26.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 18.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 87.9%, a difference of 2.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.5% compared to 53.4%, a difference of 7.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 18.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Switzerland communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 61.8%), professional degree (4.6% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 55.0%), and master's degree (14.7% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 42.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.8% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.43%), kindergarten (97.8% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.43%), and 1st grade (97.8% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.44%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Switzerland communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (24.0% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 13.4%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.4% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 12.9%), and ambulatory disability (6.1% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 7.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 2.5%), hearing disability (3.2% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 4.0%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 5.0%).