Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Immigrants from Spain Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 91,137,191 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Spain within Immigrant from Zimbabwe communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.503. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Zimbabwe within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.128% in Immigrants from Spain. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Zimbabwe corresponds to an increase of 128.0 Immigrants from Spain.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Immigrants from Spain communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($47,394 compared to $50,933, a difference of 7.5%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($97,880 compared to $103,752, a difference of 6.0%), and median male earnings ($57,352 compared to $60,750, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($63,643 compared to $63,540, a difference of 0.16%), median female earnings ($41,527 compared to $42,815, a difference of 3.1%), and householder income under 25 years ($51,914 compared to $53,560, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Immigrants from Spain communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.3% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 17.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 16.6%), and married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 15.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.6% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 0.65%), child poverty under the age of 5 (15.8% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 0.70%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.6% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 0.76%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Immigrants from Spain communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.0% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 16.3%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 13.4%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.0% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.1% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 0.37%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 2.9%), and male unemployment (4.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Immigrants from Spain communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 33.7%, a difference of 12.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.9% compared to 73.2%, a difference of 3.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.8% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.16%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 0.40%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.2% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.63%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Immigrants from Spain communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 8.5%), family households with children (27.8% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 4.4%), and single mother households (6.2% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (30.3% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 0.020%), average family size (3.19 compared to 3.17, a difference of 0.66%), and family households (63.5% compared to 62.4%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Immigrants from Spain communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 47.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 12.7%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 12.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 5.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.6% compared to 50.4%, a difference of 10.3%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 12.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Immigrants from Spain communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 20.1%), doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 17.2%), and master's degree (17.4% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 9.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.19%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.20%), and 1st grade (98.1% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.20%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Immigrants from Spain communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (6.7% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 12.6%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.6% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 7.0%), and hearing disability (3.0% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (5.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 0.21%), vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 0.24%), and cognitive disability (17.5% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 0.80%).