Czechoslovakian vs Immigrants from Portugal Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 141,799,596 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Portugal within Czechoslovakian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.785. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Czechoslovakians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.182% in Immigrants from Portugal. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Czechoslovakians corresponds to an increase of 182.2 Immigrants from Portugal.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Portugal communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($60,581 compared to $55,924, a difference of 8.3%), householder income under 25 years ($51,224 compared to $54,105, a difference of 5.6%), and wage/income gap (28.2% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 5.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median household income ($84,965 compared to $84,740, a difference of 0.27%), median male earnings ($55,382 compared to $55,182, a difference of 0.36%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($95,070 compared to $95,512, a difference of 0.46%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Portugal communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.3% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 38.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.5% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 28.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.9% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 27.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (29.7% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 2.6%), single female poverty (21.3% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 2.8%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.7% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 5.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Portugal communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 23.8%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 23.4%), and unemployment (4.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 20.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 2.6%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 5.0%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.1% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 6.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Portugal communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.9% compared to 39.7%, a difference of 5.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.5% compared to 75.8%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.0% compared to 82.0%, a difference of 1.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.22%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.5% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 0.34%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.58%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Portugal communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.9% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 22.2%), single father households (2.3% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 13.6%), and births to unmarried women (32.0% compared to 36.2%, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.6% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 0.92%), average family size (3.13 compared to 3.18, a difference of 1.7%), and family households with children (27.0% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Portugal communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 49.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.7% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 16.5%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.1% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 16.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 88.3%, a difference of 4.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.8% compared to 52.8%, a difference of 13.3%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.1% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 16.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Portugal communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 64.6%), professional degree (4.2% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 18.6%), and doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 18.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 1.1%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 1.1%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Portugal communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 18.7%), self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 12.0%), and hearing disability (3.6% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 10.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (7.4% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 0.070%), male disability (12.3% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 0.19%), and ambulatory disability (6.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 1.3%).