Carpatho Rusyn vs Immigrants from North America Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 56,978,039 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from North America within Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.527. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Carpatho Rusyns within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.458% in Immigrants from North America. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Carpatho Rusyns corresponds to an increase of 458.2 Immigrants from North America.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Carpatho Rusyn and Immigrants from North America communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($49,113 compared to $53,307, a difference of 8.5%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($102,777 compared to $109,198, a difference of 6.2%), and householder income over 65 years ($61,093 compared to $64,856, a difference of 6.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($40,825 compared to $41,319, a difference of 1.2%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($99,449 compared to $102,407, a difference of 3.0%), and median earnings ($48,617 compared to $50,108, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Carpatho Rusyn and Immigrants from North America communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (3.9% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 13.5%), child poverty under the age of 5 (17.5% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 10.1%), and single father poverty (18.0% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 8.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male poverty (10.2% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 0.30%), poverty (11.3% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 0.35%), and female poverty (12.2% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 0.46%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Carpatho Rusyn and Immigrants from North America communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.0% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 9.3%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.9% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 6.9%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.1% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 6.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.3% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.15%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.48%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Carpatho Rusyn and Immigrants from North America communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.8% compared to 38.9%, a difference of 4.9%), in labor force | age 25-29 (87.0% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.0% compared to 63.7%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.5% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 0.79%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.5% compared to 82.5%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.3% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Carpatho Rusyn and Immigrants from North America communities in the United States are seen in married-couple households (45.7% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 5.9%), family households with children (25.2% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 5.5%), and family households (61.1% compared to 64.0%, a difference of 4.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (5.7% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 1.0%), births to unmarried women (30.9% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 1.1%), and average family size (3.06 compared to 3.12, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Carpatho Rusyn and Immigrants from North America communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.7% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 22.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 18.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.0% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 12.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.5% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 2.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.4% compared to 57.5%, a difference of 5.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.0% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 12.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Carpatho Rusyn and Immigrants from North America communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.4% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 19.6%), master's degree (17.5% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 2.0%), and college, under 1 year (67.9% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.7% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.28%), kindergarten (98.7% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.28%), and 1st grade (98.6% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.28%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Carpatho Rusyn and Immigrants from North America communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (6.3% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 10.2%), vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 5.0%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.5% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 4.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (11.9% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 0.15%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.9% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 0.50%), and ambulatory disability (6.2% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 0.56%).