Crow vs Immigrants from Nepal Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,068,129 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Nepal within Crow communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 1.000. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Crow within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.191% in Immigrants from Nepal. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Crow corresponds to an increase of 191.3 Immigrants from Nepal.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from Nepal communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($31,729 compared to $44,187, a difference of 39.3%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($74,257 compared to $102,190, a difference of 37.6%), and median family income ($76,605 compared to $104,966, a difference of 37.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($47,012 compared to $52,611, a difference of 11.9%), median female earnings ($35,266 compared to $40,704, a difference of 15.4%), and median earnings ($38,707 compared to $47,925, a difference of 23.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from Nepal communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (30.3% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 104.7%), married-couple family poverty (9.6% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 101.6%), and single male poverty (23.3% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 96.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (13.4% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 27.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.9% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 35.5%), and single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 38.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from Nepal communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (15.7% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 274.6%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (16.9% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 260.2%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (17.4% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 254.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 11.1%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 11.1%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.9% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 29.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from Nepal communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 30-34 (75.9% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 12.8%), in labor force | age > 16 (60.8% compared to 68.0%, a difference of 11.9%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (76.5% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 11.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (38.5% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 0.45%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.9% compared to 76.0%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (78.3% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 7.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from Nepal communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 57.4%), births to unmarried women (40.4% compared to 29.6%, a difference of 36.5%), and divorced or separated (14.1% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 21.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.4% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 3.9%), family households (65.3% compared to 62.7%, a difference of 4.1%), and married-couple households (41.4% compared to 45.2%, a difference of 9.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from Nepal communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 39.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 27.4%), and no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.3% compared to 89.5%, a difference of 0.27%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.7% compared to 53.5%, a difference of 4.1%), and no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from Nepal communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (10.6% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 59.5%), professional degree (3.2% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 51.5%), and bachelor's degree (27.7% compared to 41.7%, a difference of 50.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.9% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 0.55%), high school diploma (88.4% compared to 89.3%, a difference of 0.97%), and 10th grade (94.7% compared to 93.7%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from Nepal communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.2% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 53.7%), disability age 35 to 64 (14.6% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 38.5%), and disability age 18 to 34 (8.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 31.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 2.2%), cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 4.1%), and disability age over 75 (49.6% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 6.4%).