Immigrants from Oceania vs Immigrants from Liberia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 104,397,582 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Liberia within Immigrant from Oceania communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.061. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Oceania within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.002% in Immigrants from Liberia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Oceania corresponds to a decrease of 2.4 Immigrants from Liberia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Liberia communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.6% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 24.7%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($97,623 compared to $80,863, a difference of 20.7%), and householder income over 65 years ($64,416 compared to $53,967, a difference of 19.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($40,297 compared to $37,970, a difference of 6.1%), median earnings ($47,617 compared to $42,923, a difference of 10.9%), and householder income under 25 years ($53,680 compared to $47,981, a difference of 11.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Liberia communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (11.4% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 32.7%), child poverty among girls under 16 (16.1% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 25.6%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (15.9% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 24.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.4% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 2.4%), single father poverty (15.4% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 2.8%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.7% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 4.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Liberia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.1% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 27.5%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.0% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 21.2%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 15.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.16%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.2% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 5.0%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 6.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Liberia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.9% compared to 41.5%, a difference of 9.4%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 67.6%, a difference of 3.3%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.0% compared to 85.9%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (82.1% compared to 82.7%, a difference of 0.80%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.3% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Liberia communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.3% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 38.7%), births to unmarried women (30.6% compared to 37.6%, a difference of 23.1%), and married-couple households (46.9% compared to 40.3%, a difference of 16.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.1% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 0.41%), average family size (3.29 compared to 3.27, a difference of 0.61%), and single father households (2.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Liberia communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 42.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 27.5%), and no vehicles in household (9.7% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 25.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 87.8%, a difference of 2.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.5% compared to 51.3%, a difference of 12.1%), and no vehicles in household (9.7% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 25.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Liberia communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.6% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 33.2%), doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 28.3%), and master's degree (14.7% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 17.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (94.5% compared to 94.5%, a difference of 0.0%), 7th grade (95.7% compared to 95.7%, a difference of 0.030%), and 8th grade (95.3% compared to 95.4%, a difference of 0.040%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Liberia communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 18.9%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.4% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 16.5%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 12.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.0% compared to 48.1%, a difference of 0.12%), male disability (11.4% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 4.5%), and disability (11.8% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 5.3%).