Czechoslovakian vs Immigrants from Latin America Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 363,494,408 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Latin America within Czechoslovakian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.131. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Czechoslovakians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.045% in Immigrants from Latin America. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Czechoslovakians corresponds to an increase of 45.5 Immigrants from Latin America.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Latin America communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($43,806 compared to $36,823, a difference of 19.0%), wage/income gap (28.2% compared to 23.7%, a difference of 18.8%), and median family income ($103,273 compared to $86,989, a difference of 18.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,224 compared to $51,387, a difference of 0.32%), median female earnings ($38,738 compared to $35,307, a difference of 9.7%), and median household income ($84,965 compared to $75,420, a difference of 12.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Latin America communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.4% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 65.6%), receiving food stamps (10.3% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 52.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.5% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 49.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (13.4% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 1.0%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.0% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 1.2%), and single father poverty (17.1% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Latin America communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (4.8% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 27.8%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 26.3%), and unemployment (4.8% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 24.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.4% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 5.4%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.1% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 5.9%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 10.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Latin America communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.9% compared to 33.9%, a difference of 23.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.5% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 4.6%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.3% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 0.74%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.5% compared to 78.3%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.8% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Latin America communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.9% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 34.4%), single father households (2.3% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 20.2%), and births to unmarried women (32.0% compared to 37.1%, a difference of 16.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.3% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 1.3%), family households (64.6% compared to 67.2%, a difference of 4.0%), and married-couple households (48.5% compared to 44.7%, a difference of 8.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Latin America communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 32.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.8% compared to 54.3%, a difference of 10.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.7% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (7.1% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 0.39%), 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 89.8%, a difference of 2.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.7% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 5.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Latin America communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 102.8%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 37.4%), and master's degree (14.5% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 28.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 1.8%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 1.8%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Latin America communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.6% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 25.2%), disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 23.7%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 18.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (6.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 1.5%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.8% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 2.6%), and female disability (12.7% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 4.8%).