Immigrants from Belarus vs Immigrants from Germany Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 146,611,469 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Germany within Immigrant from Belarus communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.032. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Belarus within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.005% in Immigrants from Germany. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Belarus corresponds to a decrease of 5.3 Immigrants from Germany.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and Immigrants from Germany communities in the United States are seen in median female earnings ($44,757 compared to $39,603, a difference of 13.0%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($107,393 compared to $95,913, a difference of 12.0%), and median earnings ($53,043 compared to $47,566, a difference of 11.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($62,162 compared to $62,544, a difference of 0.61%), wage/income gap (25.7% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 7.1%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($111,430 compared to $103,282, a difference of 7.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and Immigrants from Germany communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.8% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 19.7%), child poverty under the age of 5 (14.7% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 18.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.8% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 16.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family poverty (8.5% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 0.050%), male poverty (10.7% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 1.7%), and female poverty (12.8% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and Immigrants from Germany communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.6% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 20.7%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.0% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 14.1%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.4% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 9.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.15%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.6% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 1.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and Immigrants from Germany communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.4% compared to 39.1%, a difference of 17.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.0% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 4.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.2% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.64%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.2% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and Immigrants from Germany communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (25.6% compared to 32.8%, a difference of 27.8%), single father households (1.9% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 22.2%), and single mother households (5.5% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 11.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.17 compared to 3.15, a difference of 0.58%), currently married (48.1% compared to 47.8%, a difference of 0.71%), and married-couple households (47.2% compared to 47.5%, a difference of 0.79%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and Immigrants from Germany communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (16.7% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 91.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.7% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 43.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (15.5% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 34.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (83.3% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 9.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (47.9% compared to 57.9%, a difference of 20.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (15.5% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 34.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and Immigrants from Germany communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (18.9% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 19.7%), no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 17.7%), and bachelor's degree (45.0% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 16.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of high school diploma (90.2% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 0.070%), 11th grade (93.3% compared to 93.4%, a difference of 0.16%), and 12th grade, no diploma (92.2% compared to 92.0%, a difference of 0.18%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and Immigrants from Germany communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.0% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 39.2%), hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 22.9%), and disability age 35 to 64 (9.7% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 22.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.1% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 0.68%), cognitive disability (16.5% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 3.1%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 5.3%).