Immigrants from Congo vs Immigrants from Cabo Verde Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 21,471,044 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Cabo Verde within Immigrant from Congo communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.142. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Congo within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.074% in Immigrants from Cabo Verde. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Congo corresponds to a decrease of 73.9 Immigrants from Cabo Verde.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Immigrants from Cabo Verde communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($72,178 compared to $84,304, a difference of 16.8%), householder income under 25 years ($43,266 compared to $50,520, a difference of 16.8%), and median male earnings ($44,204 compared to $50,009, a difference of 13.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median family income ($82,216 compared to $87,830, a difference of 6.8%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($77,850 compared to $83,542, a difference of 7.3%), and per capita income ($35,720 compared to $38,540, a difference of 7.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Immigrants from Cabo Verde communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (14.1% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 68.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.5% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 48.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.7% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 38.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (13.9% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 0.31%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (16.7% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 1.0%), and family poverty (11.9% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Immigrants from Cabo Verde communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (6.7% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 83.2%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 57.1%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.7% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 45.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.0% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 0.85%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.4% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 6.2%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.1% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 6.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Immigrants from Cabo Verde communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.7% compared to 44.7%, a difference of 7.2%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.5% compared to 86.2%, a difference of 3.2%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 86.2%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (67.1% compared to 67.3%, a difference of 0.36%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.6% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 0.95%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.3% compared to 80.3%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Immigrants from Cabo Verde communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.5% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 22.2%), single mother households (8.1% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 18.0%), and births to unmarried women (36.8% compared to 42.2%, a difference of 14.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.23 compared to 3.20, a difference of 0.81%), family households with children (27.3% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 1.1%), and divorced or separated (13.5% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Immigrants from Cabo Verde communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 83.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.2% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 37.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.0% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 25.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.0% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 10.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.1% compared to 43.3%, a difference of 20.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.0% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 25.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Immigrants from Cabo Verde communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.4% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 47.8%), doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 20.9%), and professional degree (3.6% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 18.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2nd grade (97.5% compared to 96.3%, a difference of 1.2%), 3rd grade (97.3% compared to 96.2%, a difference of 1.2%), and 1st grade (97.5% compared to 96.3%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Immigrants from Cabo Verde communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 57.5%), self-care disability (2.4% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 29.8%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.2% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 15.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (19.7% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 0.72%), disability age 65 to 74 (26.0% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 1.2%), and hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 2.5%).