Immigrants from Uzbekistan vs Haitian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 95,957,244 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Haitians within Immigrant from Uzbekistan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.062. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Uzbekistan within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.031% in Haitians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Uzbekistan corresponds to a decrease of 31.3 Haitians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uzbekistan and Haitian communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($57,941 compared to $45,903, a difference of 26.2%), per capita income ($46,929 compared to $37,289, a difference of 25.9%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($98,849 compared to $80,055, a difference of 23.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($56,331 compared to $51,912, a difference of 8.5%), householder income under 25 years ($54,846 compared to $50,231, a difference of 9.2%), and wage/income gap (22.7% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 15.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uzbekistan and Haitian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (17.0% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 24.7%), receiving food stamps (14.3% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 24.6%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (17.3% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 21.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.2% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 1.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (16.5% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 1.8%), and single mother poverty (29.3% compared to 29.8%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uzbekistan and Haitian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.3% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 35.8%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.8% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 28.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.2% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 17.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (20.5% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 0.050%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.44%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.76%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uzbekistan and Haitian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (29.2% compared to 33.4%, a difference of 14.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (70.4% compared to 73.6%, a difference of 4.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.3% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 0.97%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.1% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 0.19%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.9% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 0.27%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 0.70%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uzbekistan and Haitian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (25.8% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 49.6%), single father households (1.8% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 42.2%), and single mother households (5.9% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 42.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.7% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 1.9%), family households (63.4% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 2.8%), and average family size (3.24 compared to 3.37, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uzbekistan and Haitian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (26.7% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 78.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (12.0% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 29.1%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (3.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 26.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (73.4% compared to 88.1%, a difference of 20.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (37.9% compared to 47.6%, a difference of 25.5%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (3.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 26.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uzbekistan and Haitian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 51.7%), professional degree (5.2% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 48.8%), and master's degree (17.9% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 47.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.4% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.27%), kindergarten (97.4% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.28%), and 1st grade (97.4% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.28%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uzbekistan and Haitian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.85% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 47.3%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 22.0%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.1% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 11.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (12.3% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 0.70%), ambulatory disability (6.5% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 1.5%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.8% compared to 23.4%, a difference of 2.8%).