Czechoslovakian vs Guyanese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 139,830,549 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Guyanese within Czechoslovakian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.239. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Czechoslovakians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.057% in Guyanese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Czechoslovakians corresponds to a decrease of 56.6 Guyanese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Guyanese communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (28.2% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 54.0%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($101,387 compared to $90,966, a difference of 11.5%), and median family income ($103,273 compared to $93,373, a difference of 10.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median earnings ($46,658 compared to $45,470, a difference of 2.6%), median household income ($84,965 compared to $80,734, a difference of 5.2%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($95,070 compared to $89,940, a difference of 5.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Guyanese communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.3% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 62.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.5% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 52.5%), and married-couple family poverty (4.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 49.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (29.7% compared to 29.8%, a difference of 0.31%), single female poverty (21.3% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 1.6%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.0% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Guyanese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.5% compared to 24.8%, a difference of 50.8%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.0% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 44.2%), and unemployment (4.8% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 44.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.1% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 0.070%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 6.9%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 7.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Guyanese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.9% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 52.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.5% compared to 69.2%, a difference of 12.0%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.3% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 0.39%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 0.99%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.8% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Guyanese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.9% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 29.2%), married-couple households (48.5% compared to 41.4%, a difference of 17.4%), and currently married (48.8% compared to 41.6%, a difference of 17.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.6% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 0.96%), family households with children (27.0% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 2.8%), and divorced or separated (12.3% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 6.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Guyanese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 29.3%, a difference of 274.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.1% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 104.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.7% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 89.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 70.8%, a difference of 30.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.8% compared to 35.4%, a difference of 69.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.7% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 89.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Guyanese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 87.3%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 29.8%), and professional degree (4.2% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 12.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 1.5%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.5%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Guyanese communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 55.4%), disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.0%, a difference of 49.0%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 35.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 0.60%), disability age over 75 (46.6% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 0.68%), and disability age 65 to 74 (23.0% compared to 23.4%, a difference of 1.7%).