Pima vs Eastern European Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 59,489,024 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Eastern Europeans within Pima communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.543. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pima within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.026% in Eastern Europeans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pima corresponds to a decrease of 26.3 Eastern Europeans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Pima and Eastern European communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($30,644 compared to $55,780, a difference of 82.0%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($73,365 compared to $120,684, a difference of 64.5%), and median family income ($77,431 compared to $125,546, a difference of 62.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,503 compared to $54,066, a difference of 5.0%), median female earnings ($35,326 compared to $45,385, a difference of 28.5%), and wage/income gap (21.1% compared to 28.6%, a difference of 35.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pima and Eastern European communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (11.4% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 177.8%), family poverty (18.4% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 153.6%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (29.0% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 120.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.8% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 12.6%), single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 41.8%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (28.4% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 42.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pima and Eastern European communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (11.8% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 171.5%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (11.7% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 133.4%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (18.9% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 118.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 3.2%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 3.9%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.3% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 24.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pima and Eastern European communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (69.0% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 16.2%), in labor force | age 25-29 (74.3% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 15.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (72.8% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 14.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 36.4%, a difference of 6.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (69.0% compared to 74.8%, a difference of 8.3%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (79.0% compared to 85.7%, a difference of 8.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pima and Eastern European communities in the United States are seen in single father households (4.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 113.4%), births to unmarried women (51.5% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 85.6%), and single mother households (8.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 59.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.1% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 1.6%), family households (65.9% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 4.0%), and divorced or separated (12.9% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 14.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pima and Eastern European communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 33.2%), no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 21.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 17.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.3% compared to 88.5%, a difference of 2.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 54.8%, a difference of 5.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 17.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pima and Eastern European communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (9.2% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 128.3%), professional degree (3.3% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 114.4%), and doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 113.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.27%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.27%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.27%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pima and Eastern European communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (38.6% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 87.3%), vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 69.0%), and disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 62.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.8% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 15.2%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 17.7%), and male disability (12.8% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 18.1%).