Pima vs Bolivian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 47,868,580 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Bolivians within Pima communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.967. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pima within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.192% in Bolivians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pima corresponds to an increase of 191.7 Bolivians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Pima and Bolivian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($73,365 compared to $118,871, a difference of 62.0%), per capita income ($30,644 compared to $49,526, a difference of 61.6%), and median household income ($63,262 compared to $102,195, a difference of 61.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,503 compared to $58,506, a difference of 13.6%), median female earnings ($35,326 compared to $43,445, a difference of 23.0%), and wage/income gap (21.1% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 26.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pima and Bolivian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (11.4% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 149.2%), family poverty (18.4% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 143.6%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (29.7% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 124.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.8% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 0.37%), single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 48.9%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (28.4% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 62.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pima and Bolivian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (11.8% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 183.9%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (11.7% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 127.0%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (18.9% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 120.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.60%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 15.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.3% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 27.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pima and Bolivian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (57.4% compared to 68.2%, a difference of 18.8%), in labor force | age 20-64 (69.0% compared to 81.7%, a difference of 18.3%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (72.8% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 16.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 36.0%, a difference of 5.7%), in labor force | age 30-34 (79.0% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 8.9%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (69.0% compared to 75.2%, a difference of 9.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pima and Bolivian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (4.2% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 83.5%), births to unmarried women (51.5% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 80.9%), and single mother households (8.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 42.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.9% compared to 66.5%, a difference of 0.79%), family households with children (27.1% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 8.8%), and average family size (3.75 compared to 3.29, a difference of 14.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pima and Bolivian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 64.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 14.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 58.3%, a difference of 12.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 5.8%), 1 or more vehicles in household (86.3% compared to 91.5%, a difference of 6.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 58.3%, a difference of 12.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pima and Bolivian communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (9.2% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 108.3%), bachelor's degree (23.2% compared to 44.6%, a difference of 92.0%), and doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 79.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (93.9% compared to 94.3%, a difference of 0.38%), 8th grade (95.6% compared to 95.0%, a difference of 0.60%), and nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.61%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pima and Bolivian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (38.6% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 84.1%), disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 80.5%), and vision disability (3.3% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 79.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.0%, a difference of 2.7%), cognitive disability (18.8% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 14.1%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 23.4%).