Choctaw vs Belizean Community Comparison

COMPARE

Choctaw
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Belizean
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Choctaw

Belizeans

Fair
Tragic
2,496
SOCIAL INDEX
22.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
254th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,156
SOCIAL INDEX
9.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
320th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Belizean Integration in Choctaw Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 107,954,067 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Belizeans within Choctaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.867. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Choctaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.213% in Belizeans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Choctaw corresponds to an increase of 212.9 Belizeans.
Choctaw Integration in Belizean Communities

Choctaw vs Belizean Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Belizean communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (28.1% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 32.5%), householder income under 25 years ($45,450 compared to $51,094, a difference of 12.4%), and median female earnings ($33,775 compared to $37,429, a difference of 10.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($47,729 compared to $48,358, a difference of 1.3%), householder income over 65 years ($53,060 compared to $54,580, a difference of 2.9%), and median earnings ($40,270 compared to $42,702, a difference of 6.0%).
Choctaw vs Belizean Income
Income MetricChoctawBelizean
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$35,999
Tragic
$39,097
Median Family Income
Tragic
$84,835
Tragic
$90,880
Median Household Income
Tragic
$69,947
Tragic
$77,028
Median Earnings
Tragic
$40,270
Tragic
$42,702
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$47,729
Tragic
$48,358
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$33,775
Tragic
$37,429
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$45,450
Tragic
$51,094
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$78,168
Tragic
$84,534
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$82,287
Tragic
$88,684
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$53,060
Tragic
$54,580
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
28.1%
Exceptional
21.2%

Choctaw vs Belizean Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Belizean communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (20.7% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 27.8%), single male poverty (17.0% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 26.5%), and single female poverty (27.2% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 21.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family poverty (11.6% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 3.2%), married-couple family poverty (6.3% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 4.1%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (21.1% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 4.7%).
Choctaw vs Belizean Poverty
Poverty MetricChoctawBelizean
Poverty
Tragic
15.6%
Tragic
14.8%
Families
Tragic
11.6%
Tragic
11.3%
Males
Tragic
14.4%
Tragic
13.6%
Females
Tragic
16.8%
Tragic
15.9%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
24.3%
Average
20.1%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
18.1%
Tragic
15.1%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
23.5%
Tragic
20.3%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
21.0%
Tragic
19.9%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
21.3%
Tragic
19.9%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
21.1%
Tragic
20.2%
Single Males
Tragic
17.0%
Tragic
13.4%
Single Females
Tragic
27.2%
Tragic
22.4%
Single Fathers
Tragic
20.7%
Average
16.2%
Single Mothers
Tragic
36.4%
Tragic
31.0%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.3%
Tragic
6.5%
Seniors Over 65 years
Poor
11.4%
Tragic
13.6%
Seniors Over 75 years
Fair
12.5%
Tragic
14.8%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
13.6%
Tragic
14.8%

Choctaw vs Belizean Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Belizean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment (5.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 17.8%), female unemployment (5.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 17.2%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.8% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 16.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.4% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 2.7%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.5% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 3.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.8% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 5.3%).
Choctaw vs Belizean Unemployment
Unemployment MetricChoctawBelizean
Unemployment
Poor
5.4%
Tragic
6.4%
Males
Tragic
5.6%
Tragic
6.5%
Females
Poor
5.4%
Tragic
6.3%
Youth < 25
Tragic
12.1%
Tragic
13.8%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
19.0%
Tragic
21.6%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
10.6%
Tragic
11.8%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.5%
Tragic
7.7%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.4%
Tragic
6.6%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.3%
Tragic
5.7%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
4.7%
Tragic
5.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.0%
Tragic
5.6%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
5.5%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
5.7%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
5.5%
Seniors > 75
Fair
8.8%
Exceptional
8.4%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
9.8%
Tragic
8.4%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.9%
Fair
9.1%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.9%
Tragic
6.5%

Choctaw vs Belizean Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Belizean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 32.8%, a difference of 15.9%), in labor force | age > 16 (61.5% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 5.5%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (75.4% compared to 78.2%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.7% compared to 73.4%, a difference of 1.7%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.4% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (81.0% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 2.6%).
Choctaw vs Belizean Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricChoctawBelizean
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
61.5%
Poor
64.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
75.4%
Tragic
78.2%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.0%
Tragic
32.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Fair
74.7%
Tragic
73.4%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
81.0%
Tragic
83.1%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
81.4%
Tragic
83.5%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
80.5%
Tragic
83.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
78.2%
Tragic
80.8%

Choctaw vs Belizean Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Belizean communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (14.1% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 16.7%), currently married (46.3% compared to 42.2%, a difference of 9.7%), and married-couple households (46.0% compared to 42.2%, a difference of 8.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.9% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 0.18%), births to unmarried women (36.9% compared to 37.0%, a difference of 0.43%), and family households with children (28.1% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 1.0%).
Choctaw vs Belizean Family Structure
Family Structure MetricChoctawBelizean
Family Households
Exceptional
64.9%
Excellent
64.8%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.1%
Exceptional
27.8%
Married-couple Households
Fair
46.0%
Tragic
42.2%
Average Family Size
Fair
3.21
Exceptional
3.39
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.7%
Tragic
2.6%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.0%
Tragic
7.6%
Currently Married
Fair
46.3%
Tragic
42.2%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
14.1%
Fair
12.1%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
36.9%
Tragic
37.0%

Choctaw vs Belizean Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Belizean communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 81.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 23.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 23.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.2% compared to 85.7%, a difference of 7.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.3% compared to 51.0%, a difference of 16.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 23.9%).
Choctaw vs Belizean Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricChoctawBelizean
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.9%
Tragic
14.3%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.2%
Tragic
85.7%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.3%
Tragic
51.0%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
23.0%
Tragic
18.6%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.8%
Average
6.3%

Choctaw vs Belizean Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Belizean communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.8% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 65.7%), master's degree (11.0% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 12.6%), and bachelor's degree (29.4% compared to 32.8%, a difference of 11.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (59.3% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 1.2%), nursery school (98.3% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 1.3%), and kindergarten (98.3% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 1.3%).
Choctaw vs Belizean Education Level
Education Level MetricChoctawBelizean
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.8%
Tragic
3.0%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
97.0%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
97.0%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
96.9%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
96.8%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Tragic
96.6%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Tragic
96.1%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.7%
Tragic
95.8%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.5%
Tragic
95.3%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.5%
Tragic
93.5%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.2%
Tragic
93.1%
9th Grade
Excellent
95.1%
Tragic
91.8%
10th Grade
Fair
93.6%
Tragic
90.2%
11th Grade
Tragic
91.8%
Tragic
88.8%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
89.8%
Tragic
87.0%
High School Diploma
Tragic
87.8%
Tragic
84.3%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
83.1%
Tragic
80.9%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
59.3%
Tragic
60.1%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
52.3%
Tragic
54.4%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
37.8%
Tragic
40.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
29.4%
Tragic
32.8%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.0%
Tragic
12.4%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.2%
Tragic
3.6%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.4%
Tragic
1.4%

Choctaw vs Belizean Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Belizean communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 64.9%), disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 61.0%), and disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 40.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.4% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 2.6%), disability age over 75 (52.7% compared to 49.4%, a difference of 6.6%), and self-care disability (3.0% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 10.3%).
Choctaw vs Belizean Disability
Disability MetricChoctawBelizean
Disability
Tragic
15.4%
Poor
11.9%
Males
Tragic
15.4%
Fair
11.4%
Females
Tragic
15.4%
Tragic
12.5%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.9%
Exceptional
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.9%
Exceptional
5.4%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
9.0%
Excellent
6.4%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
16.4%
Tragic
12.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
30.2%
Tragic
25.8%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
52.7%
Tragic
49.4%
Vision
Tragic
3.3%
Tragic
2.4%
Hearing
Tragic
4.5%
Exceptional
2.8%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.4%
Tragic
18.0%
Ambulatory
Tragic
8.3%
Tragic
6.5%
Self-Care
Tragic
3.0%
Tragic
2.7%