Luxembourger vs Arab Community Comparison

COMPARE

Luxembourger
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Arab
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Luxembourgers

Arabs

Excellent
Average
9,215
SOCIAL INDEX
89.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
27th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
6,013
SOCIAL INDEX
57.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
166th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Arab Integration in Luxembourger Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 139,818,808 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Arabs within Luxembourger communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.581. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Luxembourgers within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.157% in Arabs. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Luxembourgers corresponds to an increase of 157.5 Arabs.
Luxembourger Integration in Arab Communities

Luxembourger vs Arab Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Arab communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 3.1%), median household income ($86,418 compared to $88,398, a difference of 2.3%), and householder income over 65 years ($60,967 compared to $62,266, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($45,663 compared to $45,662, a difference of 0.0%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($97,237 compared to $97,336, a difference of 0.10%), and median family income ($106,183 compared to $106,952, a difference of 0.72%).
Luxembourger vs Arab Income
Income MetricLuxembourgerArab
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$45,663
Exceptional
$45,662
Median Family Income
Excellent
$106,183
Excellent
$106,952
Median Household Income
Good
$86,418
Excellent
$88,398
Median Earnings
Excellent
$47,640
Exceptional
$48,599
Median Male Earnings
Excellent
$56,300
Exceptional
$57,298
Median Female Earnings
Average
$39,891
Excellent
$40,718
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$50,379
Tragic
$51,219
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Excellent
$97,237
Excellent
$97,336
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Excellent
$103,536
Excellent
$104,566
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Average
$60,967
Good
$62,266
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.4%
Poor
26.6%

Luxembourger vs Arab Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Arab communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (3.9% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 45.8%), family poverty (7.2% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 27.9%), and receiving food stamps (9.1% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 25.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (20.4% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 1.3%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.9% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 1.7%), and single mother poverty (28.5% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 1.7%).
Luxembourger vs Arab Poverty
Poverty MetricLuxembourgerArab
Poverty
Exceptional
10.6%
Fair
12.7%
Families
Exceptional
7.2%
Fair
9.2%
Males
Exceptional
9.5%
Poor
11.6%
Females
Exceptional
11.6%
Fair
13.7%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
20.9%
Poor
20.5%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.1%
Good
13.2%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
14.9%
Average
17.4%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.6%
Fair
16.6%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.8%
Fair
16.8%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.3%
Fair
16.8%
Single Males
Tragic
13.4%
Fair
13.0%
Single Females
Excellent
20.4%
Good
20.7%
Single Fathers
Tragic
17.1%
Poor
16.6%
Single Mothers
Excellent
28.5%
Good
29.0%
Married Couples
Exceptional
3.9%
Tragic
5.7%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.2%
Good
10.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
10.8%
Average
12.2%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.1%
Good
11.5%

Luxembourger vs Arab Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Arab communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.7% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 23.3%), unemployment (4.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 22.3%), and female unemployment (4.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 21.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 3.3%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 4.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 4.7%).
Luxembourger vs Arab Unemployment
Unemployment MetricLuxembourgerArab
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.3%
Fair
5.3%
Males
Exceptional
4.5%
Fair
5.4%
Females
Exceptional
4.4%
Fair
5.3%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.0%
Poor
11.8%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
15.1%
Excellent
17.2%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.1%
Tragic
10.6%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Excellent
6.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
4.8%
Average
5.4%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Average
4.7%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Poor
4.6%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Average
4.8%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Good
4.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Average
5.4%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.8%
Excellent
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.7%
Tragic
9.5%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.6%
Tragic
7.9%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.3%
Tragic
9.3%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.0%
Fair
5.6%

Luxembourger vs Arab Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Arab communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (45.3% compared to 36.8%, a difference of 23.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (79.0% compared to 74.6%, a difference of 5.9%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (81.9% compared to 79.2%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (66.7% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 2.3%), in labor force | age 30-34 (86.6% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 2.7%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (86.4% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 3.1%).
Luxembourger vs Arab Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricLuxembourgerArab
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.7%
Good
65.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
81.9%
Poor
79.2%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
45.3%
Good
36.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
79.0%
Poor
74.6%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
86.9%
Tragic
84.2%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
86.6%
Tragic
84.3%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
86.4%
Tragic
83.8%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
85.0%
Poor
82.4%

Luxembourger vs Arab Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Arab communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.6% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 8.4%), currently married (49.3% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 4.9%), and single father households (2.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 4.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (29.4% compared to 29.2%, a difference of 0.83%), family households (63.3% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 1.2%), and divorced or separated (11.3% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 2.1%).
Luxembourger vs Arab Family Structure
Family Structure MetricLuxembourgerArab
Family Households
Tragic
63.3%
Fair
64.1%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
27.0%
Exceptional
28.0%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
48.5%
Good
46.9%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.10
Average
3.23
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Exceptional
2.1%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.6%
Excellent
6.0%
Currently Married
Exceptional
49.3%
Good
47.0%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.3%
Exceptional
11.6%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
29.4%
Exceptional
29.2%

Luxembourger vs Arab Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Arab communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 95.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.9% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 10.3%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 9.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (94.8% compared to 89.6%, a difference of 5.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.1% compared to 55.0%, a difference of 7.3%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 9.6%).
Luxembourger vs Arab Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricLuxembourgerArab
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
5.4%
Average
10.5%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
94.8%
Average
89.6%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.1%
Fair
55.0%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
20.9%
Poor
18.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
6.6%
Poor
6.0%

Luxembourger vs Arab Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Arab communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 32.3%), professional degree (4.6% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 9.3%), and master's degree (15.3% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 8.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of associate's degree (48.9% compared to 49.0%, a difference of 0.070%), nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.59%), and kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.60%).
Luxembourger vs Arab Education Level
Education Level MetricLuxembourgerArab
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.6%
Average
2.1%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.5%
Fair
97.9%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.5%
Fair
97.9%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Fair
97.9%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Fair
97.8%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Fair
97.7%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Average
97.5%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Average
97.3%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Average
97.0%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.2%
Good
96.2%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.0%
Good
95.9%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.3%
Good
95.1%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.4%
Excellent
94.0%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.5%
Excellent
92.9%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
93.3%
Excellent
91.6%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.7%
Excellent
89.7%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.6%
Excellent
86.6%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
68.2%
Exceptional
67.2%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
62.1%
Exceptional
61.6%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
48.9%
Exceptional
49.0%
Bachelor's Degree
Excellent
39.8%
Exceptional
40.9%
Master's Degree
Good
15.3%
Exceptional
16.7%
Professional Degree
Good
4.6%
Exceptional
5.0%
Doctorate Degree
Excellent
1.9%
Exceptional
2.1%

Luxembourger vs Arab Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Arab communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 10.7%), hearing disability (3.2% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 9.0%), and vision disability (1.9% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (11.3% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 0.72%), male disability (11.1% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 1.4%), and female disability (11.6% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 2.5%).
Luxembourger vs Arab Disability
Disability MetricLuxembourgerArab
Disability
Exceptional
11.3%
Excellent
11.4%
Males
Good
11.1%
Excellent
11.0%
Females
Exceptional
11.6%
Exceptional
11.9%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.3%
Good
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.3%
Exceptional
5.4%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
6.9%
Good
6.5%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.6%
Excellent
10.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.4%
Excellent
22.8%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
44.8%
Good
47.1%
Vision
Exceptional
1.9%
Excellent
2.1%
Hearing
Tragic
3.2%
Average
3.0%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.4%
Average
17.3%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.6%
Exceptional
5.9%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.2%
Good
2.4%