Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population with a Degree in Social Sciences in Iowa

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Social Sciences
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Iowa
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population with a Degree in Social Sciences in Iowa

0.0%
100.0%
Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population with a Degree in Social Sciences in Iowa Map

Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population with a Degree in Social Sciences in Iowa

City % Graduates vs State vs National
1. Toronto 100.0% 5.7% (+94.3)#1 8.1% (+91.9)#42
2. Millersburg 59.5% 5.7% (+53.8)#2 8.1% (+51.4)#120
3. Lacona 56.1% 5.7% (+50.4)#3 8.1% (+48.0)#140
4. Dundee 50.0% 5.7% (+44.3)#4 8.1% (+41.9)#181
5. Chatsworth 50.0% 5.7% (+44.3)#5 8.1% (+41.9)#202
6. Vail 40.0% 5.7% (+34.3)#6 8.1% (+31.9)#304
7. Barnes City 40.0% 5.7% (+34.3)#7 8.1% (+31.9)#315
8. Aredale 40.0% 5.7% (+34.3)#8 8.1% (+31.9)#320
9. La Motte 38.1% 5.7% (+32.4)#9 8.1% (+30.0)#344
10. Lineville 36.2% 5.7% (+30.5)#10 8.1% (+28.1)#379
11. Westgate 35.3% 5.7% (+29.6)#11 8.1% (+27.2)#396
12. Baldwin 33.3% 5.7% (+27.6)#12 8.1% (+25.3)#440
13. Hastings 33.3% 5.7% (+27.6)#13 8.1% (+25.3)#443
14. Unionville 33.3% 5.7% (+27.6)#14 8.1% (+25.3)#446
15. Dana 33.3% 5.7% (+27.6)#15 8.1% (+25.3)#458
16. Knierim 30.0% 5.7% (+24.3)#16 8.1% (+21.9)#544
17. Fairport 25.8% 5.7% (+20.1)#17 8.1% (+17.7)#752
18. Ollie 25.0% 5.7% (+19.3)#18 8.1% (+16.9)#821
19. Webb 25.0% 5.7% (+19.3)#19 8.1% (+16.9)#827
20. Palmer 25.0% 5.7% (+19.3)#20 8.1% (+16.9)#828
21. Archer 24.0% 5.7% (+18.3)#21 8.1% (+15.9)#895
22. Renwick 23.8% 5.7% (+18.1)#22 8.1% (+15.7)#905
23. Hedrick 23.2% 5.7% (+17.5)#23 8.1% (+15.1)#948
24. Watkins 23.1% 5.7% (+17.4)#24 8.1% (+15.0)#961
25. Sioux Rapids 22.8% 5.7% (+17.1)#25 8.1% (+14.7)#981
26. Plainfield 22.6% 5.7% (+16.9)#26 8.1% (+14.5)#996
27. Vining 22.2% 5.7% (+16.5)#27 8.1% (+14.2)#1,050
28. Collins 21.7% 5.7% (+16.1)#28 8.1% (+13.7)#1,090
29. Somers 21.4% 5.7% (+15.7)#29 8.1% (+13.4)#1,134
30. Bennett 20.6% 5.7% (+14.9)#30 8.1% (+12.5)#1,233
31. Swedesburg 20.6% 5.7% (+14.9)#31 8.1% (+12.5)#1,235
32. Lakota 20.0% 5.7% (+14.3)#32 8.1% (+11.9)#1,309
33. Brunsville 20.0% 5.7% (+14.3)#33 8.1% (+11.9)#1,324
34. Clayton 20.0% 5.7% (+14.3)#34 8.1% (+11.9)#1,339
35. Stanwood 19.0% 5.7% (+13.4)#35 8.1% (+11.0)#1,468
36. Sherrill 18.6% 5.7% (+12.9)#36 8.1% (+10.5)#1,548
37. Elk Run Heights 17.9% 5.7% (+12.3)#37 8.1% (+9.88)#1,659
38. Middle Amana 17.6% 5.7% (+11.9)#38 8.1% (+9.54)#1,721
39. Grinnell 16.8% 5.7% (+11.1)#39 8.1% (+8.70)#1,892
40. Hillsboro 16.7% 5.7% (+11.0)#40 8.1% (+8.60)#1,955
41. Cromwell 16.7% 5.7% (+11.0)#41 8.1% (+8.60)#1,961
42. Walnut 16.2% 5.7% (+10.5)#42 8.1% (+8.08)#2,062
43. Farmington 16.0% 5.7% (+10.3)#43 8.1% (+7.93)#2,108
44. Hornick 15.4% 5.7% (+9.70)#44 8.1% (+7.31)#2,277
45. Marne 15.4% 5.7% (+9.70)#45 8.1% (+7.31)#2,290
46. Newhall 15.2% 5.7% (+9.49)#46 8.1% (+7.10)#2,344
47. Lansing 15.0% 5.7% (+9.31)#47 8.1% (+6.93)#2,394
48. Swea City 15.0% 5.7% (+9.31)#48 8.1% (+6.93)#2,397
49. Saylorville 14.9% 5.7% (+9.17)#49 8.1% (+6.78)#2,448
50. Mcgregor 14.7% 5.7% (+9.04)#50 8.1% (+6.66)#2,484
51. Prairieburg 14.3% 5.7% (+8.60)#51 8.1% (+6.21)#2,660
52. Waterville 14.3% 5.7% (+8.60)#52 8.1% (+6.21)#2,664
53. Andover 14.3% 5.7% (+8.60)#53 8.1% (+6.21)#2,670
54. Ledyard 14.3% 5.7% (+8.60)#54 8.1% (+6.21)#2,676
55. Charles City 14.2% 5.7% (+8.54)#55 8.1% (+6.15)#2,689
56. Arnolds Park 14.2% 5.7% (+8.49)#56 8.1% (+6.10)#2,701
57. Brooklyn 14.0% 5.7% (+8.31)#57 8.1% (+5.93)#2,764
58. Fostoria 14.0% 5.7% (+8.27)#58 8.1% (+5.88)#2,780
59. Fruitland 13.6% 5.7% (+7.92)#59 8.1% (+5.53)#2,931
60. Kanawha 13.6% 5.7% (+7.88)#60 8.1% (+5.50)#2,946
61. Washburn 13.3% 5.7% (+7.65)#61 8.1% (+5.26)#3,063
62. Farmersburg 13.3% 5.7% (+7.65)#62 8.1% (+5.26)#3,066
63. Brighton 13.2% 5.7% (+7.47)#63 8.1% (+5.09)#3,159
64. Elliott 13.0% 5.7% (+7.36)#64 8.1% (+4.97)#3,219
65. Lime Springs 13.0% 5.7% (+7.36)#65 8.1% (+4.97)#3,220
66. Panora 13.0% 5.7% (+7.30)#66 8.1% (+4.92)#3,247
67. Birmingham 12.8% 5.7% (+7.08)#67 8.1% (+4.69)#3,368
68. Riverside 12.8% 5.7% (+7.07)#68 8.1% (+4.69)#3,375
69. Laurens 12.7% 5.7% (+7.03)#69 8.1% (+4.64)#3,402
70. Hills 12.7% 5.7% (+7.00)#70 8.1% (+4.61)#3,413
71. West Union 12.6% 5.7% (+6.89)#71 8.1% (+4.50)#3,469
72. Crystal Lake 12.5% 5.7% (+6.81)#72 8.1% (+4.43)#3,540
73. Clio 12.5% 5.7% (+6.81)#73 8.1% (+4.43)#3,567
74. Maharishi Vedic City 12.4% 5.7% (+6.76)#74 8.1% (+4.38)#3,588
75. Monticello 12.3% 5.7% (+6.64)#75 8.1% (+4.25)#3,654
76. Glenwood 12.1% 5.7% (+6.46)#76 8.1% (+4.07)#3,743
77. Olin 12.0% 5.7% (+6.31)#77 8.1% (+3.93)#3,825
78. Conesville 11.8% 5.7% (+6.08)#78 8.1% (+3.69)#3,955
79. University Heights 11.7% 5.7% (+5.99)#79 8.1% (+3.60)#4,028
80. Shellsburg 11.7% 5.7% (+5.96)#80 8.1% (+3.58)#4,038
81. Van Horne 11.7% 5.7% (+5.96)#81 8.1% (+3.58)#4,040
82. Rock Valley 11.5% 5.7% (+5.86)#82 8.1% (+3.47)#4,116
83. Kellogg 11.5% 5.7% (+5.79)#83 8.1% (+3.40)#4,165
84. Northwood 11.5% 5.7% (+5.77)#84 8.1% (+3.39)#4,179
85. Monona 11.4% 5.7% (+5.69)#85 8.1% (+3.31)#4,239
86. Independence 11.4% 5.7% (+5.67)#86 8.1% (+3.29)#4,252
87. Norwalk 11.2% 5.7% (+5.53)#87 8.1% (+3.14)#4,353
88. Packwood 11.1% 5.7% (+5.43)#88 8.1% (+3.04)#4,440
89. Larrabee 11.1% 5.7% (+5.43)#89 8.1% (+3.04)#4,469
90. Reinbeck 11.0% 5.7% (+5.29)#90 8.1% (+2.91)#4,571
91. Rolfe 10.9% 5.7% (+5.22)#91 8.1% (+2.84)#4,621
92. Mitchellville 10.6% 5.7% (+4.93)#92 8.1% (+2.55)#4,875
93. Windsor Heights 10.5% 5.7% (+4.86)#93 8.1% (+2.48)#4,937
94. Martelle 10.5% 5.7% (+4.84)#94 8.1% (+2.46)#4,968
95. Maurice 10.5% 5.7% (+4.84)#95 8.1% (+2.46)#4,971
96. Washta 10.5% 5.7% (+4.84)#96 8.1% (+2.46)#4,979
97. Spillville 10.4% 5.7% (+4.73)#97 8.1% (+2.35)#5,063
98. Riceville 10.1% 5.7% (+4.45)#98 8.1% (+2.06)#5,332
99. Lisbon 10.1% 5.7% (+4.39)#99 8.1% (+2.01)#5,376
100. Charter Oak 10.0% 5.7% (+4.31)#100 8.1% (+1.93)#5,448

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population with a Degree in Social Sciences in Iowa?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population with a Degree in Social Sciences in Iowa are:
#1
100.0%
#2
59.5%
#3
56.1%
#4
50.0%
#5
50.0%
#6
40.0%
#7
40.0%
#8
40.0%
#9
38.1%
#10
36.2%
What city has the Highest Percentage of Population with a Degree in Social Sciences in Iowa?
Toronto has the Highest Percentage of Population with a Degree in Social Sciences in Iowa with 100.0%.
What is the Percentage of Population with a Degree in Social Sciences in the State of Iowa?
Percentage of Population with a Degree in Social Sciences in Iowa is 5.7%.
What is the Percentage of Population with a Degree in Social Sciences in the United States?
Percentage of Population with a Degree in Social Sciences in the United States is 8.1%.