Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Cleaning & Maintenance in Kansas

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Cleaning & Maintenance
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Kansas
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Cleaning & Maintenance in Kansas

0.0%
100.0%
Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Cleaning & Maintenance in Kansas Map

Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Cleaning & Maintenance in Kansas

City % Employed vs State vs National
1. Shallow Water 100.0% 3.3% (+96.7)#1 3.5% (+96.5)#17
2. Kelly 100.0% 3.3% (+96.7)#2 3.5% (+96.5)#28
3. Farlington 77.5% 3.3% (+74.2)#3 3.5% (+74.0)#36
4. Munjor 43.4% 3.3% (+40.1)#4 3.5% (+39.9)#123
5. Zeandale 40.7% 3.3% (+37.5)#5 3.5% (+37.3)#138
6. Catharine 39.3% 3.3% (+36.1)#6 3.5% (+35.8)#149
7. Paxico 35.9% 3.3% (+32.7)#7 3.5% (+32.4)#181
8. Piqua 33.3% 3.3% (+30.1)#8 3.5% (+29.9)#219
9. Susank 33.3% 3.3% (+30.1)#9 3.5% (+29.9)#222
10. Bogue 31.6% 3.3% (+28.3)#10 3.5% (+28.1)#242
11. Wabaunsee 30.4% 3.3% (+27.2)#11 3.5% (+27.0)#262
12. Navarre 29.5% 3.3% (+26.3)#12 3.5% (+26.1)#273
13. Kickapoo Site 1 26.9% 3.3% (+23.7)#13 3.5% (+23.4)#336
14. Levant 25.8% 3.3% (+22.5)#14 3.5% (+22.3)#368
15. Hunnewell 23.3% 3.3% (+20.1)#15 3.5% (+19.9)#457
16. Chautauqua 23.1% 3.3% (+19.8)#16 3.5% (+19.6)#468
17. Gaylord 22.9% 3.3% (+19.6)#17 3.5% (+19.4)#477
18. Englewood 22.2% 3.3% (+19.0)#18 3.5% (+18.7)#511
19. Utica 21.5% 3.3% (+18.3)#19 3.5% (+18.1)#542
20. Croweburg 20.9% 3.3% (+17.7)#20 3.5% (+17.4)#576
21. Hazelton 20.6% 3.3% (+17.3)#21 3.5% (+17.1)#593
22. Lincolnville 19.1% 3.3% (+15.8)#22 3.5% (+15.6)#695
23. Sun City 19.0% 3.3% (+15.8)#23 3.5% (+15.6)#700
24. Huron 18.8% 3.3% (+15.5)#24 3.5% (+15.3)#721
25. Onaga 18.6% 3.3% (+15.3)#25 3.5% (+15.1)#731
26. Rexford 18.0% 3.3% (+14.7)#26 3.5% (+14.5)#789
27. Kanorado 17.7% 3.3% (+14.4)#27 3.5% (+14.2)#805
28. Nashville 17.2% 3.3% (+14.0)#28 3.5% (+13.8)#849
29. Aurora 17.1% 3.3% (+13.9)#29 3.5% (+13.7)#863
30. Prescott 16.9% 3.3% (+13.6)#30 3.5% (+13.4)#891
31. Latham 16.1% 3.3% (+12.9)#31 3.5% (+12.6)#974
32. Burr Oak 15.9% 3.3% (+12.6)#32 3.5% (+12.4)#997
33. Wallace 15.2% 3.3% (+11.9)#33 3.5% (+11.7)#1,085
34. Grenola 14.9% 3.3% (+11.6)#34 3.5% (+11.4)#1,131
35. Cambridge 14.7% 3.3% (+11.4)#35 3.5% (+11.2)#1,157
36. Glen Elder 14.3% 3.3% (+11.1)#36 3.5% (+10.8)#1,229
37. Kickapoo Site 2 14.3% 3.3% (+11.0)#37 3.5% (+10.8)#1,251
38. Mayetta 14.1% 3.3% (+10.8)#38 3.5% (+10.6)#1,280
39. Detroit 13.8% 3.3% (+10.6)#39 3.5% (+10.4)#1,338
40. Dunlap 13.8% 3.3% (+10.5)#40 3.5% (+10.3)#1,349
41. Elbing 13.4% 3.3% (+10.2)#41 3.5% (+9.95)#1,427
42. Marienthal 12.9% 3.3% (+9.64)#42 3.5% (+9.42)#1,572
43. Hoxie 12.8% 3.3% (+9.53)#43 3.5% (+9.31)#1,611
44. Lewis 12.6% 3.3% (+9.30)#44 3.5% (+9.07)#1,677
45. Milford 12.5% 3.3% (+9.24)#45 3.5% (+9.02)#1,684
46. Fall River 12.5% 3.3% (+9.24)#46 3.5% (+9.02)#1,689
47. Elsmore 12.5% 3.3% (+9.24)#47 3.5% (+9.02)#1,700
48. Green 12.3% 3.3% (+9.02)#48 3.5% (+8.80)#1,763
49. Ingalls 12.2% 3.3% (+8.97)#49 3.5% (+8.75)#1,780
50. Cassoday 12.2% 3.3% (+8.96)#50 3.5% (+8.74)#1,786
51. White City 11.8% 3.3% (+8.57)#51 3.5% (+8.35)#1,914
52. Richmond 11.8% 3.3% (+8.50)#52 3.5% (+8.28)#1,925
53. Plevna 11.6% 3.3% (+8.37)#53 3.5% (+8.15)#1,969
54. Sedan 11.4% 3.3% (+8.13)#54 3.5% (+7.91)#2,054
55. Coolidge 11.4% 3.3% (+8.10)#55 3.5% (+7.88)#2,073
56. Denison 11.3% 3.3% (+8.01)#56 3.5% (+7.78)#2,108
57. Sylvan Grove 11.2% 3.3% (+7.92)#57 3.5% (+7.70)#2,137
58. Ensign 11.1% 3.3% (+7.85)#58 3.5% (+7.63)#2,170
59. Bassett 11.1% 3.3% (+7.85)#59 3.5% (+7.63)#2,176
60. Blue Mound 11.0% 3.3% (+7.71)#60 3.5% (+7.49)#2,214
61. Cunningham 10.9% 3.3% (+7.67)#61 3.5% (+7.45)#2,237
62. Florence 10.8% 3.3% (+7.59)#62 3.5% (+7.37)#2,262
63. Manchester 10.8% 3.3% (+7.55)#63 3.5% (+7.33)#2,284
64. Buffalo 10.8% 3.3% (+7.53)#64 3.5% (+7.31)#2,288
65. Ashland 10.7% 3.3% (+7.48)#65 3.5% (+7.26)#2,302
66. Holyrood 10.6% 3.3% (+7.39)#66 3.5% (+7.17)#2,342
67. Hamilton 10.6% 3.3% (+7.33)#67 3.5% (+7.11)#2,366
68. White Cloud 10.5% 3.3% (+7.27)#68 3.5% (+7.04)#2,391
69. Mclouth 10.5% 3.3% (+7.20)#69 3.5% (+6.98)#2,418
70. Dearing 10.2% 3.3% (+6.98)#70 3.5% (+6.76)#2,510
71. Cherokee 10.0% 3.3% (+6.77)#71 3.5% (+6.55)#2,605
72. Louisville 10.0% 3.3% (+6.74)#72 3.5% (+6.52)#2,628
73. Larned 9.9% 3.3% (+6.62)#73 3.5% (+6.39)#2,704
74. Simpson 9.8% 3.3% (+6.58)#74 3.5% (+6.35)#2,728
75. Edgerton 9.6% 3.3% (+6.35)#75 3.5% (+6.13)#2,837
76. La Crosse 9.6% 3.3% (+6.34)#76 3.5% (+6.12)#2,840
77. Allen 9.4% 3.3% (+6.09)#77 3.5% (+5.87)#2,975
78. Milan 9.1% 3.3% (+5.83)#78 3.5% (+5.61)#3,115
79. Grandview Plaza 9.0% 3.3% (+5.73)#79 3.5% (+5.51)#3,184
80. Johnson City 8.9% 3.3% (+5.66)#80 3.5% (+5.44)#3,222
81. Everest 8.7% 3.3% (+5.43)#81 3.5% (+5.21)#3,391
82. Morganville 8.7% 3.3% (+5.43)#82 3.5% (+5.21)#3,399
83. Mulberry 8.6% 3.3% (+5.37)#83 3.5% (+5.15)#3,454
84. Severy 8.5% 3.3% (+5.29)#84 3.5% (+5.06)#3,509
85. Nickerson 8.4% 3.3% (+5.14)#85 3.5% (+4.92)#3,613
86. Gypsum 8.3% 3.3% (+5.07)#86 3.5% (+4.85)#3,664
87. Randall 8.3% 3.3% (+5.07)#87 3.5% (+4.85)#3,669
88. Kickapoo Tribal Center 8.3% 3.3% (+5.07)#88 3.5% (+4.85)#3,677
89. Leon 8.2% 3.3% (+4.99)#89 3.5% (+4.76)#3,743
90. Albert 8.2% 3.3% (+4.90)#90 3.5% (+4.68)#3,829
91. Towanda 8.0% 3.3% (+4.75)#91 3.5% (+4.53)#3,958
92. Agra 8.0% 3.3% (+4.74)#92 3.5% (+4.52)#3,969
93. Zenda 7.9% 3.3% (+4.63)#93 3.5% (+4.41)#4,066
94. Anthony 7.9% 3.3% (+4.62)#94 3.5% (+4.40)#4,078
95. Scott City 7.8% 3.3% (+4.58)#95 3.5% (+4.35)#4,114
96. Wilson 7.7% 3.3% (+4.48)#96 3.5% (+4.26)#4,187
97. Eskridge 7.7% 3.3% (+4.43)#97 3.5% (+4.21)#4,227
98. Fairview 7.7% 3.3% (+4.43)#98 3.5% (+4.21)#4,233
99. Elk Falls 7.7% 3.3% (+4.43)#99 3.5% (+4.21)#4,246
100. Russell Springs 7.7% 3.3% (+4.43)#100 3.5% (+4.21)#4,256

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Cleaning & Maintenance in Kansas?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Cleaning & Maintenance in Kansas are:
#1
43.4%
#2
39.3%
#3
35.9%
#4
33.3%
#5
33.3%
#6
31.6%
#7
26.9%
#8
25.8%
#9
23.3%
#10
23.1%
What city has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Cleaning & Maintenance in Kansas?
Munjor has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Cleaning & Maintenance in Kansas with 43.4%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Cleaning & Maintenance in the State of Kansas?
Percentage of Population Employed in Cleaning & Maintenance in Kansas is 3.3%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Cleaning & Maintenance in the United States?
Percentage of Population Employed in Cleaning & Maintenance in the United States is 3.5%.