Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Cleaning & Maintenance in Mississippi

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Cleaning & Maintenance
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Mississippi
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Cleaning & Maintenance in Mississippi

0.0%
80.0%
Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Cleaning & Maintenance in Mississippi Map

Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Cleaning & Maintenance in Mississippi

City % Employed vs State vs National
1. Darling 60.8% 3.6% (+57.2)#1 3.5% (+57.3)#52
2. Glendora 43.5% 3.6% (+39.9)#2 3.5% (+40.0)#120
3. Bogue Chitto Cdp Kemper And Neshoba Counties 36.3% 3.6% (+32.7)#3 3.5% (+32.8)#175
4. Tucker 33.3% 3.6% (+29.8)#4 3.5% (+29.9)#210
5. West 33.3% 3.6% (+29.8)#5 3.5% (+29.9)#213
6. Kirkville 32.4% 3.6% (+28.8)#6 3.5% (+28.9)#231
7. Sallis 29.5% 3.6% (+25.9)#7 3.5% (+26.0)#275
8. Hillsboro 29.4% 3.6% (+25.8)#8 3.5% (+25.9)#278
9. White Oak 27.1% 3.6% (+23.6)#9 3.5% (+23.7)#329
10. Redwood 26.1% 3.6% (+22.5)#10 3.5% (+22.6)#357
11. Learned 22.2% 3.6% (+18.7)#11 3.5% (+18.7)#512
12. Pearl River 22.1% 3.6% (+18.6)#12 3.5% (+18.6)#521
13. Osyka 19.2% 3.6% (+15.6)#13 3.5% (+15.7)#689
14. Doddsville 18.2% 3.6% (+14.6)#14 3.5% (+14.7)#764
15. Edwards 16.4% 3.6% (+12.8)#15 3.5% (+12.9)#944
16. De Soto 15.6% 3.6% (+12.0)#16 3.5% (+12.1)#1,028
17. Redwater 15.5% 3.6% (+12.0)#17 3.5% (+12.1)#1,039
18. Foxworth 15.4% 3.6% (+11.8)#18 3.5% (+11.9)#1,054
19. Chunky 15.1% 3.6% (+11.6)#19 3.5% (+11.6)#1,088
20. Bentonia 15.0% 3.6% (+11.5)#20 3.5% (+11.6)#1,104
21. Fayette 14.9% 3.6% (+11.4)#21 3.5% (+11.4)#1,122
22. Coahoma 14.5% 3.6% (+11.0)#22 3.5% (+11.0)#1,205
23. Glendale 13.0% 3.6% (+9.44)#23 3.5% (+9.52)#1,543
24. Rolling Fork 12.9% 3.6% (+9.34)#24 3.5% (+9.42)#1,573
25. Webb 12.9% 3.6% (+9.30)#25 3.5% (+9.37)#1,588
26. Friars Point 12.8% 3.6% (+9.20)#26 3.5% (+9.28)#1,623
27. Morton 12.6% 3.6% (+9.05)#27 3.5% (+9.13)#1,659
28. Artesia 12.5% 3.6% (+8.94)#28 3.5% (+9.02)#1,683
29. Pearlington 11.9% 3.6% (+8.38)#29 3.5% (+8.45)#1,882
30. Lyman 11.8% 3.6% (+8.25)#30 3.5% (+8.32)#1,918
31. Anguilla 11.6% 3.6% (+8.02)#31 3.5% (+8.10)#1,981
32. Enterprise 11.5% 3.6% (+7.98)#32 3.5% (+8.06)#1,991
33. Bude 11.5% 3.6% (+7.95)#33 3.5% (+8.03)#2,007
34. Rena Lara 11.3% 3.6% (+7.78)#34 3.5% (+7.86)#2,085
35. Hermanville 10.6% 3.6% (+7.02)#35 3.5% (+7.09)#2,369
36. Lena 10.5% 3.6% (+6.97)#36 3.5% (+7.04)#2,390
37. Gunnison 10.5% 3.6% (+6.91)#37 3.5% (+6.98)#2,414
38. Rosedale 10.3% 3.6% (+6.73)#38 3.5% (+6.81)#2,486
39. Sunflower 10.3% 3.6% (+6.69)#39 3.5% (+6.77)#2,506
40. Puckett 10.2% 3.6% (+6.62)#40 3.5% (+6.70)#2,531
41. Mathiston 10.1% 3.6% (+6.56)#41 3.5% (+6.63)#2,561
42. Gattman 10.0% 3.6% (+6.44)#42 3.5% (+6.52)#2,632
43. Biggersville 10.0% 3.6% (+6.44)#43 3.5% (+6.52)#2,633
44. Prentiss 9.9% 3.6% (+6.35)#44 3.5% (+6.43)#2,677
45. West Hattiesburg 9.6% 3.6% (+6.06)#45 3.5% (+6.14)#2,830
46. Kiln 9.5% 3.6% (+5.94)#46 3.5% (+6.01)#2,895
47. Mantachie 9.5% 3.6% (+5.92)#47 3.5% (+6.00)#2,903
48. Hazlehurst 9.4% 3.6% (+5.82)#48 3.5% (+5.90)#2,955
49. Hatley 9.3% 3.6% (+5.79)#49 3.5% (+5.87)#2,976
50. Hollandale 9.2% 3.6% (+5.60)#50 3.5% (+5.68)#3,063
51. Escatawpa 9.1% 3.6% (+5.58)#51 3.5% (+5.66)#3,076
52. Water Valley 9.1% 3.6% (+5.51)#52 3.5% (+5.58)#3,139
53. Lambert 9.0% 3.6% (+5.48)#53 3.5% (+5.56)#3,154
54. Moss Point 9.0% 3.6% (+5.43)#54 3.5% (+5.51)#3,182
55. Drew 8.9% 3.6% (+5.38)#55 3.5% (+5.46)#3,211
56. Schlater 8.9% 3.6% (+5.33)#56 3.5% (+5.41)#3,258
57. New Hebron 8.8% 3.6% (+5.28)#57 3.5% (+5.36)#3,303
58. Falkner 8.8% 3.6% (+5.23)#58 3.5% (+5.30)#3,333
59. Gloster 8.7% 3.6% (+5.10)#59 3.5% (+5.18)#3,435
60. North Carrollton 8.4% 3.6% (+4.84)#60 3.5% (+4.91)#3,620
61. Raleigh 8.2% 3.6% (+4.68)#61 3.5% (+4.75)#3,760
62. Poplarville 8.2% 3.6% (+4.63)#62 3.5% (+4.70)#3,806
63. Jonestown 8.1% 3.6% (+4.57)#63 3.5% (+4.65)#3,855
64. Arkabutla 8.0% 3.6% (+4.44)#64 3.5% (+4.52)#3,967
65. Tremont 7.8% 3.6% (+4.27)#65 3.5% (+4.34)#4,123
66. Beaumont 7.5% 3.6% (+3.98)#66 3.5% (+4.06)#4,379
67. Bolton 7.5% 3.6% (+3.96)#67 3.5% (+4.04)#4,393
68. Slate Springs 7.5% 3.6% (+3.94)#68 3.5% (+4.02)#4,416
69. Tchula 7.4% 3.6% (+3.84)#69 3.5% (+3.91)#4,528
70. Arcola 7.3% 3.6% (+3.76)#70 3.5% (+3.83)#4,616
71. Indianola 7.3% 3.6% (+3.74)#71 3.5% (+3.82)#4,637
72. Clarksdale 7.3% 3.6% (+3.72)#72 3.5% (+3.79)#4,651
73. Latimer 7.3% 3.6% (+3.70)#73 3.5% (+3.77)#4,671
74. Boyle 7.2% 3.6% (+3.68)#74 3.5% (+3.75)#4,696
75. Laurel 7.0% 3.6% (+3.47)#75 3.5% (+3.55)#4,890
76. Cary 7.0% 3.6% (+3.43)#76 3.5% (+3.51)#4,949
77. Lexington 6.9% 3.6% (+3.39)#77 3.5% (+3.46)#4,991
78. Nicholson 6.9% 3.6% (+3.36)#78 3.5% (+3.44)#5,024
79. Plantersville 6.9% 3.6% (+3.35)#79 3.5% (+3.42)#5,041
80. Magnolia 6.8% 3.6% (+3.29)#80 3.5% (+3.36)#5,131
81. Ackerman 6.8% 3.6% (+3.28)#81 3.5% (+3.36)#5,137
82. Charleston 6.8% 3.6% (+3.22)#82 3.5% (+3.30)#5,219
83. Morgantown 6.7% 3.6% (+3.18)#83 3.5% (+3.25)#5,271
84. Itta Bena 6.6% 3.6% (+3.08)#84 3.5% (+3.16)#5,400
85. Pelahatchie 6.5% 3.6% (+2.97)#85 3.5% (+3.04)#5,551
86. Dumas 6.5% 3.6% (+2.93)#86 3.5% (+3.01)#5,603
87. Coldwater 6.5% 3.6% (+2.89)#87 3.5% (+2.97)#5,659
88. Leland 6.4% 3.6% (+2.83)#88 3.5% (+2.90)#5,747
89. Byhalia 6.4% 3.6% (+2.80)#89 3.5% (+2.88)#5,784
90. Shelby 6.3% 3.6% (+2.73)#90 3.5% (+2.81)#5,898
91. Tutwiler 6.2% 3.6% (+2.69)#91 3.5% (+2.77)#5,952
92. Scooba 6.2% 3.6% (+2.69)#92 3.5% (+2.77)#5,955
93. Winstonville 6.2% 3.6% (+2.69)#93 3.5% (+2.77)#5,992
94. Polkville 6.2% 3.6% (+2.59)#94 3.5% (+2.67)#6,133
95. Shannon 6.1% 3.6% (+2.56)#95 3.5% (+2.64)#6,187
96. Saltillo 6.1% 3.6% (+2.55)#96 3.5% (+2.63)#6,199
97. Isola 6.1% 3.6% (+2.51)#97 3.5% (+2.59)#6,246
98. Meridian 6.1% 3.6% (+2.50)#98 3.5% (+2.58)#6,256
99. Burnsville 6.0% 3.6% (+2.43)#99 3.5% (+2.51)#6,381
100. Ashland 6.0% 3.6% (+2.43)#100 3.5% (+2.51)#6,392

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Cleaning & Maintenance in Mississippi?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Cleaning & Maintenance in Mississippi are:
#1
60.8%
#2
43.5%
#3
33.3%
#4
33.3%
#5
29.5%
#6
29.4%
#7
27.1%
#8
22.2%
#9
22.1%
#10
19.2%
What city has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Cleaning & Maintenance in Mississippi?
Darling has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Cleaning & Maintenance in Mississippi with 60.8%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Cleaning & Maintenance in the State of Mississippi?
Percentage of Population Employed in Cleaning & Maintenance in Mississippi is 3.6%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Cleaning & Maintenance in the United States?
Percentage of Population Employed in Cleaning & Maintenance in the United States is 3.5%.